Talk:Martin Van Buren
eltpascn
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Martin Van Buren article.
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Article policies | |
LMFAO! This is classic.
A tip of my Hat to you sir for the finest article I have seen here--124.182.191.186 08:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
From VFH[edit]
For. It's true, it could be written about anyone, but I think that's what makes it so funny--that an insulting article like this is written about an obscure president, of all people. Wehpudicabok 03:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)- Retracting earlier vote. It's been changed and I don't like it anymore. Wehpudicabok 22:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment You're a dick and an ebay cheat, you squirrel murdering racist. --Captain Finding Nemo 03:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Instead of slinging insults, I think I'll write why I no longer like the article here. The insults aren't supposed to be funny. What was funny about this article was the pettiness that the guy had--it was clear that Van Buren himself had never done anything wrong, and the guy was just trying pathetically to make him look bad. That was funny. Slinging insult after curse word after insult is not funny. Weppy, the Wehpudicabok -- Hi there! (ticker tape) 05:13, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Is this more to your liking, your majesty?--Captain Finding Nemo 02:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Um... no, but what's up there now is. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
It sucks[edit]
Yep. Not funny whatsoever. Read this. Outright sarcasm is NOT a Replacement for Humour --thematrixeætsyou, the (adjective) (talk) (flames) 05:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Not funny? Think again - who on earth would have thought I and The Llama Llover had come up with this? Just consider this one big joke we have made on the readers. -- The Colonel (talk) 06:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
It actually made the main page? WTF?[edit]
Wow. I go away from Uncyclopedia for a few weeks and the article I edited the shit out of to try to please the morons retards masses actually makes the main page? Holy hell in a handbasket. I guess anything is possible.
Well...it's not like I'm not grateful. I am. It's nice this finally made it to the main page. I'd be happier if a few certain people hadn't edited the shit out of it from my original edits, but hey, that's what the edit link is for I guess! --Captain Finding Nemo 04:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Very Not Funny[edit]
I've come to expect a high standard of quality from Uncyclopedia, and this article has completely disappointed me. It's just a bunch of "Me and Van Buren were hanging out the other day, and he thinks he's so cool, but he's totally not" bullshit. I submit that this article be trashed, and a new one created. Except for the time travel bit. I'm a fan of Van Buren's time travel. Brash 04:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- This article seems to have divided Uncyc in terms of who likes it and who doesn't. I really like it, and I think people who don't are taking the whole idea of it way too seriously. Anyway, it was featured, and the stuff you added to it totally disrupted the theme of the article, so I had to remove it.
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- I find it odd that you would post a link to Uncyclopedia's HTBFANJS article on my userpage, and yet defend this travesty masquerading as a humorous article. There needs to be some serious revisions to this article, if not outright deletion according to the "@#$%^&*" rule, among others. Brash 06:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Okay. I invite you to nominate this on VFD and see what happens. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, if this is the kind of unmitigated shit that the Uncyclopedia likes to produce, then by all means, do not let me interfere. I appear to be stepping on the turf of some very unfunny, sophomoric children who would rather waste a page on bullshit "gossip humor," rather than on something genuinely funny. Brash 20:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Did Martin Van Buren put you up to this? That shithead is always pulling off lame pranks like that. He expects people to find it funny, but all he does is wind up annoying the hell out of them, making people like him even less. Not to mention they never liked that fucktard in the first place. Goddamn Martin Van Buren. --
TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 
20:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, yeah; Martin Van Buren did put me up to it. He paid me $20 to try to get this page deleted, and I was like, "Where the hell did you get this money? You never have any goddamn money." And he was all like, "Yeah, I got it from some asshat the other day." All I know is that whether or not I get this page deleted, I've still got my $20. God bless Martin Van Buren. Brash 21:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Did Martin Van Buren put you up to this? That shithead is always pulling off lame pranks like that. He expects people to find it funny, but all he does is wind up annoying the hell out of them, making people like him even less. Not to mention they never liked that fucktard in the first place. Goddamn Martin Van Buren. --
- Well, if this is the kind of unmitigated shit that the Uncyclopedia likes to produce, then by all means, do not let me interfere. I appear to be stepping on the turf of some very unfunny, sophomoric children who would rather waste a page on bullshit "gossip humor," rather than on something genuinely funny. Brash 20:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Okay. I invite you to nominate this on VFD and see what happens.
- I find it odd that you would post a link to Uncyclopedia's HTBFANJS article on my userpage, and yet defend this travesty masquerading as a humorous article. There needs to be some serious revisions to this article, if not outright deletion according to the "@#$%^&*" rule, among others. Brash 06:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
outrageously hysterical[edit]
This is undoubtedly the funniest article on Uncyclopedia. I laughed aloud while reading it (and, incidentally, choked on my cola). 72.82.37.74 19:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
It's Sucks So Bad It's Good[edit]
Like this shit is so stupid I actually laughed. Who the hell wrote this a freaking 10 year old chick? Anyway, I'm wondering how this piece of shit got featured"....
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs fixin', please feel obligated to make whatever changes you feel are needed, (even though they'll probably be reverted 5 seconds later). Uncyclopedia is a wiki, so almost anyone can edit almost any article by almost simply following the edit link almost at the top. You don't even need to log in in most cases! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Uncyclopedia Cabal encourages you to be italic. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly, and your 6 month ban will fly by faster than you think. If you're not sure how editing works, check out proper wiki formatting, or use the sandbox to try out your vandalizing skills. DJ Mixerr 04:24, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
(talk)(contributions)
Double FA[edit]
Too bad an article can't be featured twice. 
— 04:23, August 27, 2011 (UTC)