Talk:Invader Zim

Wow. This article was featured? I mean, it's written well, but it's not very funny. Kinda makes me sad. --PantsMacKenzie 01:08, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

It might just be that you're not getting the humour, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:11, 2 July 2011

It might just be thaOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTT PAAAAAAANTS MAAAAAACCKKEEEEENNNNNNZZZEEEEEEEEEE -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:11, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

That too. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:14, 2 July 2011

Yup, the thing is, it's hard to satire something already satirical. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.69.40.120 (talk • contribs)

holy mother of tits i think this is the only actually funny article on here--70.72.80.208 05:37, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

uncyclopedia truly is complete shit --Roman Dog Bird 06:48, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Hell, I thought the original page on Zim had more humor in them than this----MisterBladez636 (talk) 09:11, February 25, 2013 (UTC)