Forum:No More Voting

Forums: Index > Village Dump > No More Voting (talk)

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5592 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Have you ever noticed how alot of things on Uncyclopedia seem to take forever to get done? Have you ever noticed how when things really get done, its because somebody has just decided to go off and do something, instead of starting a long boring discussion on the Village Dump about it, which eventually becomes an inconclusive vote? Have you ever noticed how many annoying noobs want to be admins, and win WotM, and UotM? Have you noticed the one thing that ties all of these things i together, and is therefore the biggest menace faced by Uncyclopedia, ever? Well, its voting. We have too much of it. As our userbase grows, there are just too many opinions and not enough action. I think I may have said this before somewhere, but DOWN WITH VOTING.
The below vote is a vote to end voting once and for all. If this vote is successful, there will be one vote held every year to elect the "Presidents of Uncyclopedia", who will in turn elect "Cabinet Members" (one each for VFP, VFH, VFD, UotM, WotM, et cetera), who will do all the voting in their particular sector. Everything will run more efficiently and faster, and all of the users will be free to create articles and pictures, and will no longer have to worry about anything. It probably goes without saying that this will be an admins only vote. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

No More Voting?

Score: 0 votes against voting

• For As I say above, voting is the root of all our problems, ever. Once there is no more voting everybody will be free to do what they know in their hearts to be best, without having to worry about other people disagreeing with them before they can even start. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
• Against the irony of voting to end voting. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
• For obeying zombiebaron, who understands that dictatorship is the most efficient form of government. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:19, Jul 30
• A small sherbert lemon. Which makes as much sense to me as this does. --UU - natter 08:47, Jul 30
• An against to this whole idea, and an lol at the Presidents of Uncyclopedia idea. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Also, I'm for this new idea I just came up with: a "voter blacklist" for people whose votes and history are so bad that they're not allowed to vote anymore. Also, I'm suddenly for removing Against votes on VFH. Remember when we proposed that idea and I was against it? Well I'm for it now. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
    • I only support that if we're also removing for votes. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:41, Jul 30
      • That way everybody who doesn't abstain is automatically assumed not to have voted. I support that. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)