Uncyclopedia talk:Intensive Care Unit

I assume this article is a joke. But I have to say you haven't followed your own guidelines - remember guys, "be funny and not just stupid" (TM).

Would it useful, perhaps to give instructions on how to use ICU, with its variables? instead of people having to wade to the template page? I, for one, am forgetful. --no, yuo chat 11:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC) (forgot to log in - duh!)

There is one at Template:ICU. it comes up when someone puts in {{ICU}} without the timestamp or reason. -- Soul101 ~_MA^REPENT! 11:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Attn Anon IP: we don't need you to remind us of our own guidelines. --General Insineratehymn 20:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

• Why was this changed from NRV to ICU? I liked NRV better. JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 01:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

This funny but not stupid thing is pretty arbitrary. I'm disappointed. I happen to think your example of 'stupid' - "Dutch mink farmer with laser beam eyes" -is hilarious!

I am looking for information and cannot find any on how to straighten up something I started in Uncyclopedia. It is broken up by boxes that have one sentence and then a few more lines are normal and then another sentence is in a box. When I typed the content, I did not see any such boxes.

Help! I'm busy so I can't improve The Click Five before June 11. I just saw the notice today. Thanks. --Stargirl.kyle 11:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Slim Fast

Article was a piece of Anime garbage that was tagged with "articles to fix". I tried to convert the piece into a joke about people writing Anime garbage articles. Comment was "Add some redeeming value and cut it with the general anime fetish. Article is not funny." Did I just make this article worse than the piece of crap it already was? Who keeps giving it good ratings on the "rate this article" function? I suggest you VFD it and we can hash it out there because I'm not lifting a finger to fix the thing if it isn't already safe from deletion in it's current state.--    00:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The ICU template was added invalidly, by a complete noob. (Seriously, he has literally 5 edits). As long as your working on it, it probably won't be deleted. If your worried, you can always copy it into userspace. --Mnbvcxz 06:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Boxes

I think you inserted the wrong kind of HTML tag.

Where? --Mnb'z 15:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

someone (sysop) add interwiki [[pt:Predefinição:UTI]] please. Truewww 14:11, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Sure. MrN  Fork you! 14:18, Jun 9

thanks. Truewww 14:19, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Pee Review

can you put an article tagged with ICU on Pee Review?--UNmarine777 18:24, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

OK. Look.

The ICU system is unfair to new users, especially when they don't have a clue how to fix up their shitty articles. It just forces them to work overnight on Uncyclopedia when you have other crap to get done first. Admins, you don't seem to emphasize empathize with users who've fallen victim to the dreaded ICU tag. It sucks. I guess lots of things about this place suck. (No offense to those who've joined the cabal.) Cute Zekrom! _{Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!} 21:27, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Many here do suck. It's VERY hard when you first start to write here. We know that. Have you read HTBFANJS and BGBU all the way through? That helps a lot. MrN  Fork you! 21:30, Feb 17

None taken. Also, all it takes is a little bit of soap to get yourself clean sometimes. Uncyclopedia should never be a committment or an exercise, unless that's exactly what you want to take out of it. Just a place to write funny things and hang out, y'know? If the stuff you're writing isn't too funny, ICU, Pee Review, and our userbase of experienced writers willing to give you pointers are all here to give you a push. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:33, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Personal opinion: I'm actually quite surprised that many of the most popular articles on Uncyclopedia are loaded with a crapload of profanities, and the ones I like are often voted down. I guess that's because I don't have the same sense of humo(u)r as those who make the rules here. And by the way, if you hover over the blacked-out stuff, you can see what's there... wait, you already know how it works. That stuff was a joke. I don't hate anyone here, not even admins registered users Obamagirl bitches cuntservatives. Cute Zekrom! _{Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!} 23:32, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

You can vote for feature here. If you got/get an ICU, you can try talking to the user who put it there. We don't bite. Most of the time... MrN  Fork you! 23:56, Feb 17

You should totally add this section on.

History
Once upon a time, User:ChiefjusticeDS finally found the Devil, and the Devil granted him one wish. He tilted his head, thought for 23 hours 59 minutes and 60 seconds, and came up with a question:"What is the most hideous curse that can ever placed upon those crappy stubs and sense-less humor on Uncyclopedia that will make the authors swear that they will never write such an article again?" The Devil tilted his head, thought for 23 hours 59 minutes and 60 seconds, came up with the answer:"No Redeeming Value".

No Redeeming Value. In other words, it might be funny, but it might be offensive to n00bs like me. -- This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 20:20, March 11, 2012 (UTC)