Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive-2017-06

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Kitten plant

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. On the website since 2006. The only amusement is the self-amusement of creating a deliberately bad article. Spıke 🎙️01:54 23-Apr-17
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Jesus wept.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:30, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Basically a stub which tries and fails to compellingly expand upon one of Uncyclopedia's more well-known in-jokes. Utterly pointless. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 21:47, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Delete Injoke and it isn't even put together well. —Oblique 03:47, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Delete. One for the kitty litter. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:26, May 31, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

In Utero, for 9 months

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Unfocussed waffle heavily seasoned with gibberish. SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:38, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A nonsense riff from the randumbo article about André the Giant. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:56, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Quotecruft kills the party before it gets going; an article about a nonexistent album that no one is going to look up; one paragraph of nonsense numbers before it descends to a track listing (UN:LIST). Also: Rape, penis, breasts. Spıke 🎙️02:07 24-Apr-17
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Nevermind If I was Kurt Cobain, I would have shot myself after reading this. --WeatherUnderground (talk) 23:56, May 22, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Delete I... don't get it. —Oblique 03:50, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

List of weapons that don't exist, but should/Firelegs

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.This is subpage of the article List of weapons that don't exist, but should. While the former was great and was nominated, the latter is overly long and stupid, not funny. I would suggest that this is either deleted and replaced with a small section on the main article,or at least rewritten.Waitwhereaminow (talk) 17:13, May 2, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Spıke 🎙️17:27 2-May-17
  3. As per nominator, except the part about the original being great. It was never great. Oblique (talk) 03:01, May 3, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Delete. Add to the list of articles that should not exist. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:27, May 31, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Adult

Score: -1 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Very sloppily-written. Especially the "End Result" section.--HolUp (talk) 09:30, May 27, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Admin Simsilikesims rewrote it in 2014 and I voted to keep it. Spıke 🎙️00:22 28-May-17
  2. Weak keep This article is messy. Need to ditch the infobox, break up the body into sections a little better and include some more images. But it's not delete worthy. —Oblique 04:01, May 30, 2017 (UTC)
    Have now ditched the Infobox and further spruced up the Intro. Spıke 🎙️22:32 31-May-17
Comments

Obama and card stacking

Score: 1 • voting closed
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. This is a single idea not an encyclopedic article. The premise could be developed into something amusing, yet you'd still be stuck with a single idea and not an article.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:51, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The notion that Obama excelled in figurative houses of cards could be applied to Obama-care, which at the moment is merely a redirect. The notion that he excelled in literal houses of cards is based on nothing and is not funny. Even if someone wanted to write about the land-mines built into Obama-care, you ought not start with the political thesis and then give the data (here, I think, Obama's relations with China), producing an article that promises to explain to the reader that Obama was a charlatan: Demonstrate, don't preach, and have funny and not persuasive be the obvious goal. Spıke 🎙️02:13 24-Apr-17
Keep (1)
  1. Weak keep I like the figurative house of cards idea and with a little reworking of the current content it could work. Shabidoo was never guilty of bad writing, it just needs to have a funnier direction. In the event of deletion or even if it isn't, I volunteer to rework it. —Oblique 06:19, June 7, 2017 (UTC)
Comments
  • The concept could possibly be incorporated into one of the Barack Obama articles though I personally don't see any point.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:51, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
  • Kept. Spıke 🎙️19:33 8-Jun-17

F-16 pilot

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Humourless waffle.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 21:34, April 25, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Author registered Falcon4 in 2006 to make this third attempt in one day at describing the job with the comedy strategy of fanboy cheerleading, now officially declared trite unless done well, which it is not done here. Immediately earned {{NRV}}, again, and author was told to stop re-creating it; then Admins wandered away and so did author. Spıke 🎙️22:09 25-Apr-17
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Runs out of ideas before it gets airbourne and then crashes into Chuck Norris memes. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:36, June 1, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Fandom crap, rubbish. —Oblique 06:20, June 7, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Tom's Pancake House

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Article that nobody will ever look for under its current name. It does have some decent content but I've merged said content into IHOP, which is what readers will be looking for.--HolUp (talk) 03:56, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. From Jonny appleseed from 2011. He wrote some good stuff but it doesn't include this article about a pancake restaurant Wikipedia is unaware of. Am not sure the merged content is decent; the Korea material is not comedy but a meme as a placeholder for comedy. Spıke 🎙️04:05 8-May-17
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Is it a story? Is it an advert? No. It’s just cack.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 12:04, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.Oblique 06:22, June 7, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Template:Mass Media

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Unwieldy, clunky, and hideous template. For one, it appears permanently collapsed by default, and people almost never update it. The problem with the template is that it was made with the goal of cataloging all the "mass media" that has an Uncyclopedia article; every band movie, TV show, video game, etc. There are hundreds upon thousands of those, so that goal is a nigh impossible one.--HolUp (talk) 21:22, May 27, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Whether a template achieved, or could achieve, formal completeness, is not a factor on this website. The {{New Jersey}} template is not complete, and it would not be against some rule to create it until the editor had written an article on every New Jersey municipality. {{Mass Media}} is malfunctioning for me at the moment, but I know of no way in MediaWiki to store a user's preferences for collapsed/expanded. I think it defaults to collapsed because the size of its contents exceeds some parameter. Spıke 🎙️00:58 28-May-17
Comments
  • Have detected a syntax error of mine in the system JavaScript that would have inhibited creation of the show/hide buttons for the last 14 months. However, these days, corrections have to be submitted to Wikia for approval. Spıke 🎙️01:34 28-May-17
  • Kept. No second. Spıke 🎙️19:38 8-Jun-17

Fire Vs. Water

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Purge Unsearchable waffling cack. A poor idea poorly executed  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 11:34, April 29, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Never rose above the level of the awful Wacky War genre. Spıke 🎙️12:36 29-Apr-17
  3. Ehhhh. What? —Oblique 06:21, June 7, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Rubbish.--HolUp (talk) 03:38, June 9, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Expert 3222 14:48, June 9, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I reverted this to the last version of 2008, before the Anal Rape Humor started to appear. Spıke 🎙️12:36 29-Apr-17

Man Babies

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Please forgive us for the rambling bumbling nature of the commentary Found while searching the photos used by Mocha (VFD). An essay about men squatting. 2006 contest entrant (not winner) by Mindsunwound. Spıke 🎙️02:00 11-May-17
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Purest waffle. Dull and meandering.  SIR  MAC  BOSWELL 19:26, May 12, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.--HolUp (talk) 03:39, June 9, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Expert 3222 14:50, June 9, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

September 11 attacks

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. There is little humor in this article, it just pedals an Alex Jones-esque conspiracy ("America long-planned 9/11 as a false flag attack") as if it's a fact. It's well-written admittedly, but neat writing means nothing without humor.--HolUp (talk) 02:40, May 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A little bin-Laden fanfiction, and a huge rasher of tedious, unfunny conspiracy theory. "What’s even worst than that: that same majority does not care to know the truth and/or doesn’t want to accept it (especially in North America)." Reads like advocacy. Spıke 🎙️02:56 13-May-17
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Bin Laden is so 2011. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:32, May 13, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Not funny. Expert 3222 14:54, June 9, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Needs to be redirected somewhere; I've linked to this all over the place. Spıke 🎙️02:58 13-May-17
    • I'd recommend doing it the other way around. When this page is deleted, our 9-11 page should moved to the "September 11 attacks" title. One, because that's what Wikipedia has it under (and we're a parody of WIki); two, it would eliminate the issue of not being able to put the page under its intended title, 9/11, because the slash would make it a subpage of 9.--HolUp (talk) 03:19, May 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • There is also Nine Eleven which is really bad, honestly 9-11 is the only one that is even remotely amusing. Any salvgable content from the other two articles should be merged into it and the page rename to September 11 attacks. --Oblique (talk) 12:27, May 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • Deleted and replaced by the text formerly at 9-11, as recommended by two voters. Spıke 🎙️02:57 12-Jun-17

Cold War (video game)

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. As Spike has pointed out, these game war pages are unfunny, and feel like they were made for a very specific target audience.--HolUp (talk) 00:54, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Next up. As tedious as all the others, this one with copious strikethrough and Cyrillic. There is nothing worse than a Video Game article except one written in code. Spıke 🎙️00:56 15-May-17
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Bring out the nukes. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 05:11, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Expert 3222 14:56, June 9, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Charles Murray (author)

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Trite theme of Murray being a racist which has been done to death. Needs a fresh and original angle to be funny.--HolUp (talk) 00:58, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Overt advocacy and unfunny. Murray is controversial and it should be easy to have the encyclopedia writer misinterpret or botch Murray's points, even mistaking them for racism, provided the goal is playfulness rather than condemnation, as it is here. See Larry Kudlow. Spıke 🎙️01:14 15-May-17
  3. Deserves an article, but none of this is good. Burn it and start again. --Oblique (talk) 02:51, May 15, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Expert 3222 15:00, June 9, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Walker, Texas Ranger

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Our main Chuck Norris article is surprisingly good, but this is terrible.--HolUp (talk) 05:13, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg "No one really gives a shit where in the hell it came from." Anal rape in the Intro, red-links throughout, only comedy strategy is Chuck Norris fanboyism, sprinkling on Walker/Wanker and racism. Spıke 🎙️05:19 8-Jun-17
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (formerly Delete). Nominator is fixing up the article, in particular correcting every point of my criticism. Spıke 🎙️19:32 8-Jun-17
Comments