From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 13 plop goo glagle! Blag whoop.
|
| Nominated by:
|
Aleister des Chocolate
|
For: 13
|
 Nommie&Forie BabyTV won Best Article of Poo Lit, and Black Flamingo's in-depth look at what our children are watching has network executives everywhere taking notes. Nommed because it's one of my faves on uncy, and Black Flamingo is my valentine. Yay! Aleister 18:11 14-2-Year of the Rabbit- I hate babies.
1234 ~  18:15, 14 February 2011
- For. ~
 Mimorianusa (talk) • (stalk) 20:42, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Great Loved it.
 (talk) 20:53, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I never want to see Dora the explorer again. --Sog1970 22:29, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:48, 14 February 2011
- Ah, go on then. --Black Flamingo 21:07, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
- For. It has to be. ChiefjusticeDS 21:26, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
- For. very nice. Dr. Fenwick 01:05, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Got best PLS article for a good reason ~
 15:57, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 For. To quote a famous and influential Uncyclopedian; "At first I was kinda like, 'alright, uhh wut' but then it dawned on me that the channel was kind of the product of an "artist" stonner pervert, which is actually surprisingly funny." -- Sf13  1758 EST 16 FEB 2011- buh? OrangeAipom 20:24, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
- For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:34, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
|
| Comments:
|
- Before I vote I'd like to hear people's opinions on the images. Should I remove some? That was a consistent reaction from the judges. --Black Flamingo 20:12, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
- In my humble opinion there are a whole lot of them. --Shabidoo 20:32, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
- I personally thought there were a few too many in the first section of pictures, but it wasn't too many to "ruin" the article. (talk) 20:53, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
- I got rid of a few. It's still longish but I think that conveys the feeling of watching shows like this. --Black Flamingo 21:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Abstain. The images tend to overwhelm what has been written here. The balance doesn't seem right to me.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:22, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Would removing one or two more help? --Black Flamingo 12:28, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
- You've already chopped away some good images. A baby watching the "shows" would have this overwhelming effect, which seems to capture what the page is about. With the changes I now feel underwhelmed and have turned the channel to Wonder Showzen. Aleister 14:11 17-2-'11
- Ok... Is there any way I can please everyone? --Black Flamingo 14:34, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Do a little dance. Make a little love. Aleister 14:38 17-2-'11
- Why not put all the TV images in a panel on the top of the article? At the moment they seem to break it up too much in my view. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:49, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Eeeekkk! The page won best article in Poo Lit, has 11 good votes, and already has been trimmed from its former glory. Maybe as it is now is a good compromise. I wonder what's on Wonder Showzen? Just kidding, I love the page. If you could only see how much you'd be pretty grossed out about now. Aleister 14:54 17-2-'11
- Black Flamingo asked what I didn't like about the article and that was my response. Regards gross out humour, not my Earl Grey. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:09, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
