Uncyclopedia:Reviewer of the Month/archive5
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Official Nominations For March 2014[edit]
Shabidoo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 5
- Nom&For Very nice critique on Anna Pavlova (ballet dancer) was followed by this month's review on "The Art of War", which, as Spike noticed, could as well be the longest one Uncyclopedia has ever seen! Great efforts and depth and Shabidoo certainly deserves more than two RotMs! Anton (talk) 14:26, March 13, 2014 (UTC)
- His reviews have always been in-depth and out of his depth. Very good work must be rewarded with shiny things. And thanks, Anton, for opening this page up again. Aleister 12:11 24-3-14
- For. He makes a pretty lady. --ChiefjusticePSX 06:39, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Phwoar! Also for helping bring PR back to life with PEE review lite. • Puppy's talk page • 08:17 am 26 Mar 2014
- For. Per the above. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 12:37, March 26, 2014 (UTC)
Official Nominations For April 2014[edit]
Anton199 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 3
- For. Writes quality reviews and is a splendid fellow to boot! I insist that everybody vote for him. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:32, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Well deserved, and at Chief's insistence (next month in Chiefdom). Nice work Anton. Aleister 18:45 18-4-14 (the 14 adds up to 5)
- For. Sir ScottPat (converse) 18:47, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
ChiefjusticeDS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 1
- For. Chief manages to review anything and to review it brilliantly! Don't ask me how he does it. Anton (talk) 18:43, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Both Sir ScottPat (converse) 18:47, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
Official Nominations For August 2014[edit]
SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: -1
- For. Despite the fact that he doesn't write Pee Reviews, Spike has been Uncyclopedia's most active reviewers for a long time. The feedback he gives to new users about their articles is priceless, which is not an exaggeration, and I know this from my own experience. I am not sure I would have stayed and edited uncy for so long, if it wasn't for the amount of time and efforts Spike has offered to me and to my first articles! Anton (talk) 23:35, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Against. I've thanked Anton199 elsewhere for the compliment, but this ain't right: You can't nominate for top Pee Reviewer someone who famously never does Pee Reviews, on the basis that I do stuff that's comparably good. Nominate me for something else some day, perhaps. Spıke Ѧ 02:20 17-Sep-14
- Against. Yeah I guess not. Maybe we could have a separate award for someone who gives lots of advice but not in formal pee reviews? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 17:08 21 September 2014
- Comment. I was reviewer of the month once... --ChiefjusticePSX 17:11, September 21, 2014 (UTC)