Talk:Vandalism/example on wheels!
This article was nominated for deletion on May 25th, 2011.
The result of the discussion was Keep.
|
|||
Yay! Although Famine's ought to be the subpage, since this is the ORIGINAL, 9-out-of-10-Uncyclopedians-prefer version... --User:Nintendorulez 00:06, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- You've got your cookie, more-or-less-unilaterally gifted to you by me, despite the objects your insistence has probably raised... Don't worry, my friend. Be happy!--<<>> 00:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- This is a fair enough compromise. While I agree with Nintendorulez, that ideally this should be the main page, I am satisfied with this. I will re-direct my Vandalism page here. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 13:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Can someone unstretch this page? I would but Ican't find the problem. --User:Brad89
- This is a fair enough compromise. While I agree with Nintendorulez, that ideally this should be the main page, I am satisfied with this. I will re-direct my Vandalism page here. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 13:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
I believe this page has been vandalised and now has some nonsense on it. I would fix it but my history does not seem to extend back tot he last valid page. WOuld someone with more history than me please revert it to the last valid state. InaccurateOne 05:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- ... --User:Nintendorulez 11:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
203th Decade[edit]
Yes, PAIN is a discipline. Rules are AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
7 Feb 2020 17:33
Pictures[edit]
Needs more pictures. Something random, like cows. --Wallaroo 05:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I swear, some of this stuff is inspired by Alan Ginsberg or Burroughs.
Holy Crap[edit]
This is so much more awesome than the real Vandalism article!!! Madness!SpitValve 09:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
What the...?[edit]
Where did the article go? Some crapmuncher blanked it!
Weee....[edit]
I'm having wayyyy to much fun here. POKEMON HENTAI!!! PENIS! VAGINA!!! POOPY!!!!
Umm....[edit]
Holy shit this page is huge. Look, I don't mean to sound like an asswipe, but a really big chunk this insanity needs to go. I was thinking we could start fresh. If you don't agree, please bear with me and tell me here, instead of reverting the page. PEACE OUT! :) --RedPooka 04:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, it was too big, Red Pooka, but it had some great history. I decided to restore it to a point when it was of reasonable size. I hope this is not a problem for you, but if it is you can discuss it here or on my talk page. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 04:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- No no, I'm ok with that. It's actually pretty good now. OOH.... idea... maybe create an archive of the older page?? --RedPooka 05:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Create a merged article of the old page and Camp Fuck You Die and name it "Encyclopedia Dramatica" Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- Shoop da woop. Archived! There's even a pretty archive box.--RedPooka 21:19, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- BTW, can an admin lock the archive page? I know someone's gonna go fuck it up soon... --RedPooka 03:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Someone might vandalise it? Oh, that'd be awful! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Damn it, who keeps bringing back old shit from the archive?? --RedPooka 04:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's that bitch Nintendorulez... --RedPooka 20:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I did't realize it was so horribly wrong to take one tiny bit of the old stuff, and alter it and return it to the new page. The archive isn't supposed to be edited, so changes would go to the current page. And quit flaming. Also, the votes from the poll get reset upon moving it to the other page. Calm down, get a grip, etc. Besides, if it's against your made up rules to bring back old stuff then I suppose I'm vandalising the page... --User:Nintendorulez 20:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Someone might vandalise it? Oh, that'd be awful! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Create a merged article of the old page and Camp Fuck You Die and name it "Encyclopedia Dramatica" Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Thank you[edit]
for providing me with a new homepage. This beats lastmeasure by a mile. ComaVN 19:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Heah, yeah. --User:Nintendorulez 19:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Policy on archives.[edit]
There's some edit warring over old sutff, so I thik we should bring things up for a vote.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.
Now commence flaming those who disagree with your point of view. --User:Nintendorulez 21:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Red Pooka, I realize you have a viewpoint on this, but do not alter other peoples' comments. It's a bannable offense. --User:Nintendorulez 22:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Errr, I accidentally clicked one of the poll options by mistake...sorry. Not like it matters anyway, but if it does, then whatever. --MelvanaInChains 17:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Even this lost its touch....[edit]
Why all the porno? It was funny when there was no porn at all. Now this is porn page. And it sucks. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:17, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
- I concur. also, I'll vandalise where I like on that page.--no, yuo chat 14:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- The top note is an important message to editors. Just because this page allows vandalism doesn't mean there's not a place where the line is drawn. And CS, I don't see you adding any funny nonpr0n stuff. >_> --User:Nintendorulez 19:51, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well I gave it a shot. Whatever it is, it's funnier than porn. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 00:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, yes, I agree the note is important - which is why I havent ever deleted it, but it is very tempting to type POO! above the Do not edit above this line line, just because it's there... --no, yuo chat 11:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- The page needs solid guidelines. Although perhaps sticking POO! right there will insure nobody else does anything worse if it's already vandalized... --User:Nintendorulez 20:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Who put the porn back in just after I said it's CLICHE AND NOT FUNNY? I mean one or two is fine, but if 90% of the article is porn, we might as well move this to "porn." Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Don't take out existing sections. Lots of wikivandaism commonly involves the insertion of pr0n and such. Just don't remove existing sections. --User:Nintendorulez 23:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is the thing that's been annoying me. Nintendorulez, can you pleeeeeaaaaase stop filling 1/2 of the page up with porn? If you're so determined to have a porny section in there, I'd recommend scattering it across the page so it doens't appear that 1/2 of it is porn. Eh? --RedPooka 21:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's waaaaaay down at the bottom... --User:Nintendorulez 21:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Meh, I just scattered it all over the place. Btw about the archive page, maybe an admin could lock it? --RedPooka 06:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Who put the porn back in just after I said it's CLICHE AND NOT FUNNY? I mean one or two is fine, but if 90% of the article is porn, we might as well move this to "porn." Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- The page needs solid guidelines. Although perhaps sticking POO! right there will insure nobody else does anything worse if it's already vandalized... --User:Nintendorulez 20:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- The top note is an important message to editors. Just because this page allows vandalism doesn't mean there's not a place where the line is drawn. And CS, I don't see you adding any funny nonpr0n stuff. >_> --User:Nintendorulez 19:51, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- I've protected the archive page. I have to say the hundreds of girlie images were, though mostly nice to look at, the most annoying thing on the page. Just the fact that there were so many of them making it take forever to load. But whatever, the page seems mostly ok now. Though I demand more vandalism in Benson's good name. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:59, 28
October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks Spang. Also thanks for locking my user and talk pages. ^_^ --RedPooka 19:19, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Er, why would someone possibly lock a user talk page, whilst removing all comments from it with no archival? How are people supposed to leave talk page comments? Also, there's no good in locking them as transwiki redirects, as that's impossible and never will work. --User:Nintendorulez 19:50, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Really? Have you even tried using that redirect, then using the shared talk page? :) Oh yes, the comments were archived (look in the archive box on the talk page redirected to). --RedPooka 21:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Just look at your Uncyc userpage, and you'll see that transwiki redirects cannot be done, and MediaWiki probably never will add support for them. And how are people supposed to give you comments on Uncyc if your talk page is locked? --User:Nintendorulez 22:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- You are not listening to me... nor do you seem to be willing to actually try it. Seriously, it links to my Wikipedia page. What do you mean they don't work? They do! --RedPooka 05:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- OORRR you could just use my sig. :O --RedPooka 06:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- I see this as a place for vandals to do whatever the fuck they want that way they don't screw up the real pages.If they want to add porno....let em.If they want to make a page a mile lond let em do it then archive it.If we put rules in it would be horrible. Unistyle 23:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Click it, you'll see you're sitting on a broken redir. --User:Nintendorulez 21:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Dude, it must be your computer or something, or you haven't gotten over that small arguement and want to harass me with false claims, but it works just fine for me. --RedPooka 03:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- I know for a fact that mediawiki doesn't allow for redirects from one wiki to another. Interwiki links like your sig are supported, but not redirs like your userpage. --User:Nintendorulez 21:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wtf? No really it works. Have you TRIED it? --RedPooka 06:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- OH fuck it, when Spang unlocks them I'll just use links instead. --RedPooka 06:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh noes![edit]
Use these for any fucking thing you want! Edited myself! --RedPooka 07:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
100px
Archive again?[edit]
The page has gotten back the size of the origional (almost 200kb, and possibly longer than the origional). Can I archive this like the other? --RedPooka 09:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Archiving problems[edit]
I'm trying to archive the page and I've removed the content to move to the archive but when creating the new page, I can't save it as my computer just won't take it. Now, a lot of content has been deleted and I can't revert myself! Can someone help please? --lEoN2323 23:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've archivated the page from the edit before yours. your computer is 'TEH SUX. --no, yuo chat 13:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
FYI[edit]
I'm archiving the page, it once again managed to reach the colossal 200KB mark. --RedPooka 21:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
About that top template[edit]
Is it possible to make the rules thingy show by default rather than hide by default? I'm betting most people don't bother reading it. --User:Nintendorulez 23:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
w00t![edit]
The page should probably be archived again[edit]
I'd do it myself, but I don't want RedPooka griping at me for doing something I wasn't supposed to do. -- 05:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
As long as it is over 200kb, and you archive it, I care not. :) --真夜中(talk)(contrib)7 05:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- I say the page should be archived every __ days/weeks/months, etc. I don't know how often we should do it, but it should be done. maybe once a month? two months? Jedibob5 00:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I trimmed the repetetive sections (i.e. the same thing 50 times over) and it took off a huge (i think 100kb) amount of the page. Jedibob5 00:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Bad idea[edit]
Making a page for nonsense without value was a bad idea. Isn't that what 4chan is for?
- Satire. Isn't that was Uncyclopedia is for? Making fun of vandalism is fun and funny...now fuck off --GAMESPOT=666 04:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks you! I love them OHNOEZ[edit]
yay! I fixed up most of the Pokemon section, and now, it's hella awesome, and it's not even finished yet!. And the only way I could have made it so cool is with the OHNO pokemon pictures! They saved me! Also, this page rocks. I love it, and it's so random it's hilarious!
-Serq Fet: That guy that saved a screwed section
Oh Good Lord I almost cried[edit]
Whoever added those pictures of that random guy with long hair which gets progressively bigger....thank you. Man I have not cracked up so much...dunno why I mean it's not like rational humour...gosh this entire page is an absolute MASTERPIECE. Don't change anything already there. Only add. ^-^ Seriphyn
- I won't remove anything good, but I removed a HUGE block of (worthless) text that made the page lag to death. Jedibob5 19:58, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- What happens with this page is that so much vandalism gets added on to it, it has to be archived. No worries, you can always find any of the archives on that little box --GAMESPOT=666 23:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Someone censored the page...[edit]
- Someone has censored the expletives on this page... an uncyc first. I'd revert it, but I don't remember the exact expletives used and I don't want to undo the edits after this. Jedibob5 20:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
lemming[edit]
lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming lemming 198.163.179.19 20:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Arghgg...[edit]
This page has really gone downhill since I first found it. All it is now is spamming of the same word 5 million friggin times. JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 22:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
DUDE U ARE ALL FUCKING CRAZY[edit]
Wow Vandalism Page is the SHITT...NOW I KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON INSIDE ALL OF U GUYS MINDS>>>>U>>>>>>>AREEEE>>>>>SICK
Someone removed the box.[edit]
I will fix that box and archive that page. Well... people are saying it should be archived, anyway. --TV-VCR watch 07:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
k i understand i added some real funky poop to the archive!!!
DAMN[edit]
This is awesome. This is many kinds of awesome.
Is this by the infamous user, Willy on Wheels?[edit]
Is it by the annoying Willy on Wheels and his many different proxies and usernames? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ElynC (talk • contribs)
- Please sign your posts with four tildes. The short answer is no. I believe Uncyclopedia was spared of Willy's wrath. The English Wikipedia was his (and his impersonators') primary target. —PongoV2(talk|cont) 09:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Metavandalism[edit]
I added a section on metavandalism. I hope you don't, ironically, see this as vandalism, though it obviously is. I mean, it's not, which means it is. You see? Anyway, if you don't like the idea, delete it, if you like it, improve it, or perhaps even vandalise it to get metametavandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.217.150.7 (talk • contribs)
David O'Sullivan[edit]
I wish everybody cares --Gangstah fo shizzle • MUN • Talk • Contributions • Article • Forum 11:32, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
GENIUS![edit]
PURE GENIUS!TedmundT/C 21:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
MORE VARIETY FOR THE YOUTUBE VIDEOS![edit]
ROFL! THIS PAGE IS SO HILARIOUS. IT WOULD BE SO MUCH BETTER IF THERE WERE MORE THAN 2 DIFFERENT YOUTUBE VIDEOS PUT ON HERE. MAKE THEM A LITTLE LESS PREDICTABLE & RANDOMIZE THEM!
''''LMFAO LOL LOL LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That was funny.'''' --Black Suga Baby Gurl Speak up! 05:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
FIXED GIF IMAGES[edit]
hahahahahahahaha it really works!!!
No it doesn't. --High Gen. Meganew (Stuff I've Done) (Chat With Me) (Get an Award!) ENLIST MUN 13:19, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
- it does.-- 19:46, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
I have added 50000 KBS of cowbell.[edit]
That is vandalism. 69.98.18.145 10:25, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
YEAH[edit]
If our pages got vandalized like this, WE.ARE.DOOMED.;--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 09:09, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
No Lotion[edit]
Sadly, I have no lotion to jerk off to the naked Japs. --AlmightyGameDude 00:06, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
KITTY!!!!!![edit]
I copied something into this article. Is it any good? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 15:30, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid refering to my comments made on talk:Vandalism, I can't see any humour in vandalising an article as I have no concept of good vandalism so I can't really tell. Sorry. Sir ScottPat (talk) 13:26, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
I've learned something![edit]
Most detailed article ever, Vandalism/example on wheels! was! I learned that vandalism is the #1 okay thing to do on Wikipedia. I learned that trolling is 100% acceptable on Wikipedia. I learnt that when you're blocked on Wikipedia, you get a free cupcake and a mini-candle in it! Smartest article ever! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.0.9.77 (talk • contribs) 06:19, November 18, 2014 (UTC)