Forum:Worst 100 Reflections on 2006 -- a call to arms

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Worst 100 Reflections on 2006 -- a call to arms

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4237 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

With just 47 days to go in the year, we've got, um, 21 statements in Worst 100 Reflections on 2006. I've been adding stuff as best I can; anyone else who can add thoughts, please do. More than 21 notable things happened this year, I think.--Procopius 20:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I think it's fine to start adding things before the year ends, but that sometime in early 2007 we should arrange the list in some kind of order, preferably, notability. Because right now it looks pretty out of order, and it seems that as you work your way up to #1 it gets harder and harder to think of things to add... leaving the more important at the bottom of the list, and things that barely anyone remembers at the the top.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Good point. I suspect the Aspie reflection will rise pretty high in the list, once we get 100.--Procopius 22:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I did my part and added my worst memory of the year. Sometimes, in the chill of the night, the thought of it still haunts me... --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I just noticed the part for Aspergers is a red link. I no longer see the topics in BENSON's forum, the VD, or Miniluv nor are they in the forum topic category. Just lock them so people don't edit them. But it was a hilarious flamewar, and ought to be preserved for all eternity for the people to read and laugh at this guy's idiocy. --User:Nintendorulez 00:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

For some reason the redirects were deleted. I've restored them for the time being, but if it causes problems they'll be deleted again, so update your bookmarks. --Algorithm 02:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Read through user_talk:dawg#To_whom_it_may_concern, and user_talk:Wally Burns (or skip to the end) for why the redirects were deleted, at least for a while. The pages are still there, they've just been relocated for now. I've deleted the redirect again, but if people really really need it back, it can probably be restored. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 10:00, 15 Nov 2006

Ah, looks like the problem was the lack of 's making it a red link. Anyway, why isn't it in a category for any forum? --User:Nintendorulez 21:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Should I add the part where I stole Ghelae's sig? --General Insineratehymn 00:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Should I add the part where both sigs hurt my eyes, and go above the height limit that was imposed for sigs? --User:Nintendorulez 00:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I certainly experienced that as a life altering event, A Kennedy moment infact. ( But then I again, I view getting up early in the morning a life altering event.) --Vosnul 07:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Whoa. I didn't even think my complaint would be notable. But it was. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Or how about the purges of Steve Ballmer and Kanye West quotes? Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Do it. I think this should be listed in Uncyclopedia:In-jokes too.--Procopius 13:32, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I've done my part...and Shandon's too. I'm cool like that. It helps that it #79 was partly our fault. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Quick! Someone start a flamewar! Also, that Hitler reskin could be added to the list. If i could remember where it is located. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I added the two rogue entries, if we manage to hit 100 I'll be shocked...pa pa?--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 15:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Maybe I could play Don King and arrange a site-wide flamewar between us and encyclopedia dramatica. That would probably make the list . . . --Hrodulf 20:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Flame or fecalwar ? This is the same ED we are talking about , right ? --Vosnul 20:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

How about some more BENSON stuff, like the time BENSON got banned twice in 3 days (the first 3 days I was here, I think)? After all, BENSON did a lot of stuff this year, whether you worship me or not. Benson 19:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

AND THE WAY FAMINE WOULDN'T STOP DUMPING TOPICS THE VD DOESN'T WANT INTO THE HOLY LANDS OF BENSON. IT IS NOT YOUR GARBAGE HEAP! QUIT POLLUTING OUR LANDS! --User:Nintendorulez 21:56, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I AGREE! QUIT POLLUTING THE HOLY LANDS OF BENSON OR WE SHALL DECLARE JIHAD! --General Insineratehymn 22:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Really, don't add Euroipods to the list. It doesn't belong there! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 23:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

The ongoing cold war over Euroipods is infinitely stupider than the article itself. (and Btw, Nin, I fought the good fight and tried to edit it so your name was removed and it was changed to Anais Nin, but someone else reverted it. Oh well, I tried). --Hrodulf 01:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

If something (be it euroipods or WOMEN'S RIGHTS Tourette's) is on Worst 100 Reflections on 2005, odds are it doesn't belong on this list. So if all that's left of Wikipedia's parody of itself this year is a bunch of leftover random text and clichés written after huffing too many kittens and master baiting to Oprah? --66.102.74.211 13:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

How. Many. Times?? Uncyclopedia does not belong to Wikipedia. Could you please at least attempt to get that through your thick skull? --86.129.116.196 16:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I added some stuff (about 15 items) to the list. I'm about to head to bed, or I'd add more. Feel free to fix the redlinks/delete stuff no one cares about.--<<>> 03:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Ooh, ooh, I know one... virtually giving a 13 year old Writer of the Month... I mean, WTF? 13 year olds write for ED, not Uncyc. I mean, we're just kidding ourselves here. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The rest of us are thirteen on the inside, so it's okay. Just don't let it go to your head. Oh, what the fuck, do let it go to your head.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

You're THIRTEEN!?!? Man, I don't think we realized that. In that case, we take it back. We actually have a secret stipulation against that unlucky number that also happens to be the beginning of teenhood (the evilest of years). If you were twelve, it'd be fine, but well... you've all but admitted to being thirteen. Unless something miraculous happens between now and Tommorrow, you can expect a death squad to find you at home and destroy everything you hold dear. Or, and this is really rare, we'll actually give you a pass and let you keep that award you earned. Just be on your best behavior, or it's option A, our most common way of dealing with 13-year-olds. You have been warned. (Note: There is some sarcasm hidden somewhere in this comment. If anyone finds it, please respond on my talk page. Look hard, it's there somewhere!)--<<>> 12:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm six years old. I thought everyone knew.--Procopius 15:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

We should point out that you won't be receiving the prize champagne or the coupons for the peelers. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

(Pinches the peeler coupons) -- Hindleyite Converse 19:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Well

I know we must have some more new material as of late? If it gets more than 100, than a bump on the head for everyone? Hardeehar!--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 19:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)