Forum:Too many games
Game List Editing Rules Editing Guides
At Uncyclopedia, we pride ourselves in providing genuinely humorous prose for you to enjoy. However, there is one aspect of a stand-up comedy performance that is not-so-obvious here – audience participation. For this, the Game namespace was created. So, here, we present for you every game hosted on Uncyclopedia. |
Announcement | |
---|---|
|
Game Advertisement |
---|
|
Game Cheats | |
---|---|
|
Sista Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Now, this may sound controversial, but I think we should delete a couple of these. Or just move them to Uncyclopedia:Departure of Fun. --L 05:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure. If we are going to delete, maybe we could set up a gameVFD just for this one time? I say let's see what users think first. —Braydie 06:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Why would we need a gameVFD? Doesn't VFD work just fine? --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 08:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- I mean just below here. Adding games to VFD as well as the flow of articles that we get now means flooding (which now comes with a free 1 day ban). —Braydie 11:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Why would we need a gameVFD? Doesn't VFD work just fine? --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 08:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I think we should vote them out based on quality, not because we have too many of those, it's like voting out main namespace articles for the reason of being too many. ~ 09:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I guess I see your point - some of these are rather rubbish things by a single user that never got finished - and an equivalent article would get ICUed or VFDed. Couldn't we just have some votes here (where they'll get seen) rather than setting up a new page nobody can find? (The trouble with regular VFD is it's geared to single pages - if you're not careful we'll just end up with a bunch of title-pageless games.) Having said all that, I do agree with Mordillo, and I can't say I'll be voting delete on very many of these games - most of them are either suitably bizarre offshoots of one of the main games, or they have something different enough to amuse. --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- I was just thinking out loud....while typing. I'd say just below here. —Braydie 11:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Why not just make a separate disambiguation page for the less-liked games? It would make more sense then moving them to a different article. Lord Gneo 15:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Because deleting them all would be faster and far more appropriate. Because by and large they all suck ass. 04/11 21:53
The IP that created The adventures of a Grue has registered as User:Naughty Budgie. —Another Pongo Flame Sandbox ☭ 11:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Ahhhh...well, how about being like a normal American and ignoring the problem? Or perhaps, if it REALLY does bug you THAT much, it would be a whole lot quicker to delete them, I suppose. Lord Gneo 15:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
It's a good thing that no-one wants to delete Grueslayer, because it is not deletion material. User:Trar/sig2
- I second that. —Another Pongo Flame Sandbox ☭ 10:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- We have less than enough games. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
Votes
Note: Old Discussions are at Forum:Too many games/Archive
Vote for deletion: Game:MMORPG
Keep |
|
Delete | |
Comments |
Vote for deletion: Uncyclopedia:Departure of Fun/Auto-Novel
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |