Forum:Jihad on Uncyclopedia!

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Jihad on Uncyclopedia!

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6486 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

My f***g Jesus Chrysler! Did you see that? That crazy fellow started replacing random articles with koranic passages. Now this is an original form of vandalism, I guess. Was he/she expecting to convert someone? -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 20:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, at least he admits that he needs his head...examining. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I wish someone would examine MY head. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 20:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Just don't chop my head off. :) All I know is what the movie Team America says about Jihads and Radical Muslims. "Durka Durka Muhammad Jihad!" --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 14:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

That's not the only time that's happened. Some of the User:Braydie blah blah users have done this. —Braydie at 16:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, by starting this forum you've already accomplished his will: to start yet another jihad. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to kill your camel, rape your wife, and bomb your children's school. Praise be to Allah. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

MALLAH MALLAH MALLAH! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 19:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh noes, it's teh Jihad! ALLAH! *boom* ALLAH! *boom* ALLAH! *boom* ALLAH! *boom* ALLAH! *boom* ALLAH! *boom* ALLAH! *boom* --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 19:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, great. You didn't read your own plan all that carefully, did you? Now my camel is pregnant.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Did you know the best way to protect yourself from Islamic Terrorism is to wear pork all over your body? Just as Islamic Terrorists are brainwashed into Jihad, they are also brainwashed into Halal in that touching or eating pork means they won't be going to paradise. Go ahead Jihad Johnny, blow me up, but I must warn you I am wearing Pork all over myself and you'll most likely get some Pork on your body and that'll mean no 70 virgins, no paradise, and you'll spend eternity as The Devil's cabana boy. Also if you really want to protect Wiki articles from the Internet Jihad, just place pictures of pork, bacon, ham, etc on the articles and if they edit the article, they are also editing pork as well. :) --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I might as well play along. DIRKA DIRKA DIRKA! DEATH TO AMERICA! I DELCARE JIHAD UPON YOU! --General Insineratehymn 20:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Dirka, dirka. That sounds so familiar... --AAA! (AAAA) 01:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Death to... No, wait, I'm English. [Tuts disapprovingly at people instead.] -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

DEATHS TO AMERICA!! BRITS ARE OKAY BUT CAN STILL DIE IF THEY WANT!! SOMEONE SET US UP THE BOMB!!! A JIHAD ON YOU AND YOUR RIDE!! --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 21:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Well to paraphrase William Shatner as he played Admiral James T. Kirk in "Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home" in a reply he gave to some punk. I modify it a bit and give the phrase to a Jihader. "Oh yeah? Well Double Jihad on you!" thus proving that like Kirk, I have no idea what Jihad means, but whatever it means I mean double of it on the Islamic Terrorists who call Jihad on us. :) --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 23:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I, as a muslim, would like to say that I love Uncyclopedia! Well, actually, you should realise that some muslims actually editing Uncyc and well, try not to always say horrible things about muslims, hehe. That is all, hehehe. It's gneomI 00:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

(Pushing the kids behind) OH CHRIST-ALMIGHTY-THE-SAVIOR-OF-MANKIND, THERE'S A MUSLIM RIGHT HERE!!! RUN LIKE HELL!!! SECURITY!!! -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 00:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Isn't racism HILARIOUS?? --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 00:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Is an ironic demonstration of overreacting an understandable joke? -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 00:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Depends on whether or not we're dealing with the stereotypical, less-than-5% of Muslims that Americans visualise. I just find it funny that now Americans link Muslim with Terrorist. Is this understandable? Only if you're smart enough to see that most Muslims are real people. But most people are just ignorant and racist, so no this probably isn't very understandable at all. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 00:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

But that's the point. I will not turn on my parental filter for disturbing subjects that people just pretend are automatically solved by a gesture of goodwill - you may read hipocrisy - and so turned into a taboo between "civilized people", not rednecks like me. Second: Islam is not a race, it's a religion and so imbuded with ideas as any other religion. You are not born with it and you may choose to believe something else - pardon me, this if you're not living in a country following Islamic law, in which case you should be killed by doing so, turning into an apostate. In case you wondered, I am myself an apostate of Christianism, an atheist. And third: if I understood this right, you felt offended with my lines of such obvious irony by guessing I was "an average American, just ignorant and racist". So who was stereotyping who? -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 01:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not offended at all. I agree that America has become rather ignorant and openly racist. And I also agree that the Muslim stereotype, namely a terrorist, is completely ridiculous. We Americans think we're not racist for voting for a black guy, but we think Muslim means terrorist and madrassa means terror camp. Want a typical racist American? (or to put it better, a typical American racist) Look at Rush Limbaugh. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 01:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Once again, this seems to be a fairly difficult concept for some people, but 'Muslim' is not a race, so you cannot be 'racist' if you are anti-Islamic. You might be a religist, an anti-Allahmist, an Isntlamist or a heathen, but you are not a racist. Dutchy 14:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Actually if one is discriminated against for being a Persian or Arab, then it is racist. If religion is the issue, it is not racist, but bigoted. Instead of being a racist, when one discriminates against Muslims, they are being a bigot. A racist is a bigot that is bigoted against race. Since any race can convert over to Islam, Islam is not about race, but religion. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Shame on you, Orion! You're talking like a pinko! One stuff is discriminating people, one thing far different is discussing ideas - and religions are not immune to debate. You may have an unfavorable oppinion on Islam without necessarily being a "bigot" or an "ignorant". Why no one bashing Christianism is labelled a "bigot"? -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 19:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

First let me say "Hey, Leggo my Ego!" :) Anyway the Liberals use the Politically Correct Police to say that discriminating against Christians and Christiaism as well as discriminating against white people and Euro-Americans (As we want to be called now) is allowed and one is not a bigot for discriminating against them. That other religions and races are forms of bigotry when someone discriminates or jokes about them. Most of those redneck jokes are racist, but the PCP makes sure that people who tell redneck jokes are not labeled as racists. Making Christians, Christiaism, and White People targets of jokes and discrimination, according to liberals who control the Politically Correct Police. You are correct that it should work both ways and discriminating against and making fun of Christians and White People should be a form of racism or bigotry (whatever the case) just as well as making discriminating against and making fun of Muslims and Arabs and Persians and other religions and races. Yet this is Uncyclopedia, so everyone is fair game here. Everyone gets made fun of equally. Everyone is a bigot and racist here, but only in a funny way, which is not a serious as the real racists and bigots out there in the real world. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Well I believe you guys are the good guys in the world, who are trying to make the world laugh. Not the world, but people in the world. So, hmm, Jihad My Ride!! It's gneomI 02:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Know what Uncyclopedia makes fun of Christians, Buddhists, Atheists, and other types of people as well. Yet none of them actually get upset over the stereotypes in the articles. Notice how I spoke of Islamic Terrorists or Radical Muslims, which are actually 5% of Muslims, instead of all Muslims. Sort of like making fun of Fundamentalist Christians who are 5% of all Christians but control the US government anyway, and not the rest of the Christians who don't. Traditional Muslims, Moderate Muslims, and Modern Muslims who believe that Islam is a religion of peace and do not support terrorism should not be lumped in with Islamic Terrorists and Radical Muslims. Yeah I know Jihad is supposed to be a holy struggle and a good thing, and not a war, but Radical Muslims and Islamic Terrorists have perverted its meaning to be a holy war in the same respect that Fundamentalist Christians did that when they did the Crusades and turned the Christian struggle into a holy war to convert or kill the infidels. Still this is Uncyclopedia and not Wikipedia, so if one is easily offended by having the religion made fun of, they are in the wrong Wiki. As a Christian, I laugh at the jokes here that make fun of Christianity, heck I even added to some of them as well as a few Jesii articles. So welcome to Uncyclopedia and try not to take things the wrong way here. Almost everything is meant not to be serious, and be funny in some way. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 02:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Heheheh. Somewhere further up: "...if you're smart enough to see that most Muslims are real people." So... there's a significant portion of muslims who are imaginary? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:10, 13 Feb 2007

If I may add still more pepper to this discussion, seems like every jihadist/jihadist supporter/jihadist sympathizer Muslim in the world is imaginary to most moderate Muslims - at least when they complain about how the Westerners suddenly and unreasonably turned harsher about what is the core of their religion. But yeah, I admit, Jihad My Ride was something I was not expecting to came out from a Muslim, and this is the kind of surprise everyone is expecting from moderate Muslims - incisive self-criticism. In turn, as a South American, I bet most people would not expect something as HowTo:Make Cheesy Sci-Fi coming from me - but I just don't care. I am myself, I am not a category of people. Period. -- herr doktor needsAV2  [scream!] 13:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I misspoke. Er, typed. Yeah, all Muslims are real people, but what I meant is that they're not all "ALLALLALLALLALLAAAAA!! A JIHAD ON YOOR DONKEYFACE COUNTRY!!". All of the Muslims I've ever met (being military, I move around a lot and I meet quite a few people) were all really nice, good people. But 99% Muslims don't even support al Qaeda or carry grenades on em. It's this minority group of Muslims that has become the stereotype. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 15:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Heh, I know what you meant, I just thought it was funny :) • Spang • ☃ • talk • 15:35, 13 Feb 2007

I think this whole discussion is funny. :) --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 15:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

AND HOW ABOUT THOSE DAMN CHINESE HUH! FILLING OUR COUNTRY WITH ALL THAT RICE AND... OPIUM - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)