Forum:"Clever" Forum Topic

"Funny" comment. -Bored Uncyclopedian 15:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Distracting, off-topic comment concerning that thing I wrote that one time and the awesomeness thereof. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Pathetic "attempt" to carry on the running joke --CrabPope 18:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Comment about the obvious "paradox" of this forum topic's existence. The forum topic disappears in a puff of logic. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Filler comment. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 21:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

"Filler" innuendo insinuating Nachlader is gay. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:35, 19 May

Further comment about "some" kind of paradox. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Appropriate image with "funny" caption. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:38, 19 May

Image referencing, via caption, earlier mention of image. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Porn spam in reaction to earlier mentioned "appropriate" image. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Request that original image be deleted as spam. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:03, 19 May

Whoring some new aritcle, a return of a long lost user, or other useless project--MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me} _Failings 22:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Insert Zeeky Boogy Doog here... *BLAM*! 70.30.36.76 22:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

• Pointing out that a user's too-tall sig is messing with spacing thusly...

1. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
2. MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me} _Failings
3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
4. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

• Reference to UN:N. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

• Reference to Grue. S-984 23:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

• Whoring of an article somewhat related to the previous reference. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Drive-by missing of point and completely unrelated observation. --UU - natter 11:08, May 20

• Reference to useless inside joke that hasn't been relevant since 2006 --174.102.132.245 20:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Coy inquiry as to if you are refering to Uncyclopedia as a whole. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:16, 20 May

Response that ignores inquiry completely. --MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me} _Failings 01:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Pointless attempt at getting back on topic

—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Acceptance of the negligence of the topic at hand

Apparently random comment with subliminal whoring. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Immediate goatse derail. E03 -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:29, 20 May

Pitiful attempt...

...to promote my usergroup. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

"Attempt" to start a "header-marathon" "bandwagon"...

Insert new header here. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 06:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Deliberate failure to follow bandwagon. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Snooty comment about abstract sexual acts with your closest female and/or male relative. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 07:21, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Teh comment about a different subject altogether, ignorable, even more so. -- Style  Guide 14:39, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

"NO U"

Additional taunting. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:27, 22 May

I don't get it

I don't understand what we're doing, can you guys explain so I can look cool? - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:39, May 23

You're here. You can't look cool. Sorry. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Wait, you think we look cool? How pathetic does that make you? -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:06, 23 May

Vanity to top it all off

Double exclamation about me being here to improve this to infinity +1!! -- Style  Guide 11:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Assertive statement about Chad's sexual orientations. Further assertion that I do indeed rule the school. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:09, 23 May

An important issue is brought forward

A long discussion is anticipated. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Fake interest is expressed. -- Style  Guide 11:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Comment to let everyone know that a random stranger on the Internet laughed out loud upon reading something. --Concernedresident 11:55, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Vote

Score: 0

Abstain. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:07, 23 May

Delete. Malicious vote cast because the writer of the article reverted one of my edits made four years ago. --Concernedresident 19:42, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

• Whore. Concern for sanity, first person singular. -- Style  Guide 07:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

  Patent UnConcern for previous poster's sanity, followed by stick poking of same. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:55, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Making sounds of being poked. -- Style  Guide 12:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Another "I don't get it"

Another "I don't understand what we're doing, can you guys explain so I can look cool?" —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Another "You're here. You can't look cool. Sorry." Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Generic "owned" comment, remarking on the whimsical and insulting nature of that last comment. --CrabPope 13:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

A serious comment on how this whole thing is completely pointless. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Pointed comment welcoming previous user to Uncyclopedia. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:15, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Faked innocence, snide comment, faked expression of fear. -- Style  Guide 05:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Debate

Discuss   Le Cejak • <14:26 May 24, 2009>

Dagnabbit, I'm agin it. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:33, 24 May

Attempt to start discussion about Optimuschris' sexual preferences along with a random SHOOP DA WHOOP. S-984 17:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Now Ah'm fer it. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:19, 24 May

BLAGHH! S-984 17:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Angry post pointing out that Cajek wouldn't dare say such things in real-life since he'd get an arse kicking. --Concernedresident 11:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Angrier post starting out with telling Cajek he shouldn't post, and then countering Concerned resident by saying Cajek would get an arse kicking anyways. S-984 22:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Boredom

Example of boredom. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Links to rectify boredom. S-984 22:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

"Still bored" comment. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

More links to annihilate boredom. S-984 20:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

BENSON MENTION

HE'S BETTER THAN YOU AND STUFF. BENSON

YES HE IS. S-984 20:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Generic hate on the benson lovers --MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me} _Failings 21:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

New Header talking about how this forum ties into VFH sucking

Undignified rant about VFH needing more votes, and how everyone who has added to this forum has been waisting their time, and everyone else's. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Additional assertation that Uncyclopedia has jumped the shark. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:22, 26 May

Apeshit rant about against votes. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Obvious link to UN:W Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Obvious link to UN:N —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Obvious link. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:17, 26 May

Penis

Insertion of phallic non sequitur -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Reference to RAHB —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Counter-reference to Yettie, followed by questioning Yettie's sex. S-984 23:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Witty gay joke, somehow adding Orian into the mix. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 04:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Shoop da whoop! --Docile hippopotamus 11:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion that you take it back to 4chan. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:35, 27 May

Suggestion that OptyC is fail, and that he should go back to 4chan and watch hardcore gay furry porn with his child molester friends. S-984 19:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Pointing out that OptyC obviously Sucks, and has no sort of fail in him. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Adding that fail is the same as suck, and that Opty is fail and suck, meaning he double fails. Add Epic Fail, Grue, Over 9000, and Sonic reference and picture here. S-984 19:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Agreement, with the caveat that shoop-da-whoop is still lame. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:54, 27 May

Reminder

That we seem to do this joke at least once every few months. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 18:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

The classics never get old. -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:28, 29 May

When did this start? And when did the joke stop?--MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me} _Failings 00:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

YOUR FACE. S-984 19:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

YOUR MOM.--MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me} _Failings 16:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

YOUR DAD S-984 02:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

YOUR WEENIS --MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me} _Failings 20:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

YOUR SHE-NIS! S-984 20:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

New Header

Most likely, just for the sake of a new header. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 04:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

New Subheader

To go with the shiny new header. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:30, 3 Jun

New Subsubheader

As per above. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 16:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Heder

"Yeah, there's like a butt-load of gangs at this school. This one gang kept wanting me to join 'cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff." ~ Napoleon Dynamite 16:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Reference to old weapon on the LOWTDEBS. S-984 20:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title

n00b-style question involving confusion about above posts nd like "reli bd grammer" nd Xpletives nd shit. Nameable • ((mumble?)) • 19:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Insult to n00b which makes him cry to his mom. ;) S-984 00:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment about someone's mom. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Reference to someone's sister. Nameable • mumble? 10:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

New Subheader for the "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title," because that header does not do the thing that it says it will, Namely, bring us a header with a long title. That header is an insult to ridiculously long titles everywhere. Though there are many many incidents of longer headers, this header is this size because it can be called "Extraordinarily Long" and not be lying to your face. Plus, I heard that the creator of "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title," is a silly-face.

What? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 14:09, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Another "What?" —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

One additional "what" signifying my confusion towards the neccessity of an extraordinarily long subheader for the humorously misnamed "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title" in addition to my general uncertainty about the significance of the fact that this silly topic is still being edited on a fairly regular basis. Followed by a "hmmm" which denotes my pondering whether this continued activity speaks towards the relative popularity of the topic's creator or the general malaise inherent in Uncyclopedia. A final grunt to show that in the end I really don't care all that much. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:44, 13 Jun

Agreement that header "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title" did not live up to it's name, and agreement that "New Subheader for the "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title," because that header does not do the thing that it says it will, Namely, bring us a header with a long title. That header is an insult to ridiculously long titles everywhere. Though there are many many incidents of longer headers, this header is this size because it can be called "Extraordinarily Long" and not be lying to your face. Plus, I heard that the creator of "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title," is a silly-face." completes the job description much better. This, however, is followed by utter UN-AGREEMENT that the creator of "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title" is a silly-face, for two reasons, including the fact that the creator of the header "New Header With Extraordinarily Long Title" is me (with reference to how I know myself to not being a silly-face) and also due to the impossibility of someone being a silly-face and also being able to spell "extraordinarily", which I have done many times.

Followed by insinuation that Woody is the real silly-face, and this surely is an extraordinarily long comment. Nameable • mumble? 15:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment on how fucking long everything is in this thread and that the posters who posted more than three lines should get a life. S-984 01:10, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Some witty comment of agreement. Join Us 18:49, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Mention of "UN:N" —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:51, 4 October 2009