Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Is My House Mad At Me

Vote	Score: 2 talking buildings
Nominated by:	~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 03:39 May 3
For: 5	N♥m && f♥r. Actually, I'm making this nomination against my will. My house has threatened to swallow me whole if I don't. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 03:39 May 3 SFor Sure, but a lot of people, who enjoy normal articles will be forced by their sanity to vote no. Le Cejak • <May 03, 2008 [3:52]> For It's a mad house of Cajek articles... Mr N Fork you! 04:02, May 3 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 06:54, May 4 For. - 忍者男 • Ninja Man • Talk! • The Hitlist • Pages I've Attacked • Ninja-style Main Page Time→ 19:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Against: 3	Weak against The pictures were fantastic but I felt the article just wasn't that convincing. Sorry Cajek but it was the sheer randomness that dragged it down for me. This is really just an opinion though, the article isn't bad. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Meh --Moneke 13:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Against. I remember seeing this before, and thinking it felt like Cajek trying too hard to live up to his Cajekyness. I still think that. Sorry bud, but you've done far better. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 15:20, May 4 Against I don't particularly care for it. --THINKER 13:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments:	Thanks, SysRq! I think this was nommed before, too. We'll see how it goes. Le Cejak • <May 03, 2008 [3:52]> Oh, was it? Because I don't really give a fuck. It's a funny article and belongs on the front page. Simple as that. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF @ 03:55 May 3 My house predicts 15 against votes. ...But it's an idiot. Le Cejak • <May 03, 2008 [3:58]> Just asking, when did you write this Cajek? Because it feels it lacks the awesomeness cloud of your more recent articles, also what does "scofflaw" mean? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC) (1) I wrote this before I went on my haitus, in December, soon after I got Normal featured. (2) Scofflaw is a funny word. Or at least, it was funny in December... Le Cejak • <May 03, 2008 [13:45]> (1) Ok. Cos to me it just felt a bit off. (2) Scofflaw? :p --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC) (1) You really should read the Uncyc 2008 charter again. See Section 9, Paragraph 28? Yeah. Vote for all my articles, including this one, which was during my dry spell... which is why I went on haitus. ...even though I won WotM in december... anyway yeah, (2) SCOFFLAW. >:\| Le Cejak • <May 03, 2008 [13:54]> (1) I'll take you on that, you were on it in November though looking at your articles (2) Scloffow <:B --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC) (1) November was nothing compared to April. I'm almost caught up to my adopter in VFH... maybe it's cuz I'm popular? I dunno. (2) SCOFFLAW, biatch! Le Cejak • <May 03, 2008 [14:26]> (1) Mumble grumble I ain't never gonna catch up (2)~~Buttsecks~~ yes Skoovlore --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC) (1) Doesn't matter if you do or not, you're a good writer (2) Skumlore? Le Cejak • <May 03, 2008 [14:41]> (1) Thanks! Lets keep this up til we're banned :D (2) Slumwhore (Read:me) --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Abstain - I liked the surrealism of the concept, but I just didn't feel it was a feature - maybe a quasi-feature. I dunno. --Knucmo2 22:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)