| Vote
|
Score: 9 misleading lies
|
| Nominated by:
|
Funnybony    21:54, Dec 24
|
For: 9
|
- For. Funnybony 21:55, Dec 24
- For This is funny. And insightful. And worth it's weight in electronic gold. Aleister 23:54 24Decemb12
- For. Long and shecksy SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 00:16, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:40, 26 December 2012- For. Brilliant. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:18, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
- For. Prätt Körp (talk) 04:43, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For.
 Murder Frog (Argue loudly) Ride the snake...to the lake... 15:28, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Very close to the truth. Governments do this all the time. Lantash (talk) 22:57, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
- For. --ChiefjusticeXBox 09:13, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
|
| Comments:
|
- It might be interesting if there was Unwikileaks creating misleading confusion (rewrite/renom). Cheers!--Funnybony 21:54, Dec 24
- Yes, not only does the headline not look like a headline, the lede doesn't look like a lede, giving us background on the source before it tells us what happened. This is not a satire of current events the way Wikinews might report it; it is a satire of news analysis as Stratfor might provide (in which case, why fictionalize the name of Wikileaks)? Or is it mocking both Stratfor and Wikileaks? It might come to me in ten more minutes, but so far, it's a jumble of global-conspiracy memes, Iraqi tits, Mutaween, and New World Order. Spıke Ѧ 01:23 26-Dec-12
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:36, January 17, 2013 (UTC)