| Vote
|
Score: 3 people who do NOT endorse things
|
| Nominated by:
|
Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 4
|
- Om-Nom and For Straight from pee review, I think that this is a great article, and would love to see it on the front page. --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Good. I like it, it's a good concept.--Garionepsilon 07:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- For --Sir Starnestommy
 (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 03:15, May. 18, 2008
- For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:10, May 22
|
Against: 1
|
- Against Per UU's comments, but the lack of subtlety actually really annoys me. It's one thing if the guy is sliding in slogans, but barking out orders like "SHOP THERE NOW" just doesn't say funny at all to me. The article could be executed a lot better than this. -RAHB 06:04, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
- Dickish Abstain. Our musical friend has put out quite the article, but I'm not a fan of the overlying concept. It's funny, but it wears itself out very fast. It's good, I just don't like it. =/ ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 14:20 May 16
- Abstain. I do like the concept, but I'm not fond of the execution. It looks a but ugly, and I think the complete lack of subtlety works against it. A bit more polish and refinement, and I may well change my mind. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:35, May 19
 Abstain. - As Per SysRq and Under user--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 08:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
