From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 11.5 Smug Frenchies
|
| Nominated by:
|
--Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >}
|
For: 12.5
|
- Nom + 4. Sog1970 has really done a good job here. He noticed that the DeGaulle article wasn't really about DeGaulle, so he made a biography for him. Here it is! --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 11:19 EST 11 Feb, 2010
 For. DeGaulle is an important figure in 20th Century and French history, and the article is very good. Salute. Aleister in Chains 1:06 12 Feb. MMX- For. Sog should receive Uncyclopedia's Légion d'honneur for this article !
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:20, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Pour la Gloire de France. --Sog1970 09:39, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Jesus Christ Sog, yoou're like an article machine! —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!!
  NOTM 09:41, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:10, 12 February 2010
- For. ~
     18:14, Feb 12, 2010 18:14, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- For. delicious! 24.218.240.169 22:11, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- For Fuck the French,Fuck the French,Fuck the French. --I'mthedaddy 23:03, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Striker2117 01:07, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Nice job Sog. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:14, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Negropack had a point with the anti-French sentiments, but I couldn't think of how else this article could be done. Loved the Asterix references. nldr - MrN9000 is not "looking for idiots", IC was perfectly fine and there's nothing wrong with how whatever you want to do here. THEY WERE CRAMMED WITH POOR VOCAB CHOICES, THAT'S ITTTT 03:13, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Bof. --UU - natter
 11:22, Feb 18
|
Against: 1
|
- Against. It is an article poking fun at the French in general, and DeGaulle in particular, which is fine, but the article didn't really move me. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 01:21, Feb 12 2010
|
| Comments:
|
- Pee review is here
- I can't believe you had the gall to write this. Pup 03:30, 12/02/2010
- Abstain
(Conditional For). This isn't quite as good as Sog's article on DeGaulle's infamous contemporary, though it's still pretty good. I do, however, have two complaints. First, it loses just a bit of steam at the end (which isn't a big deal), and second, there is absolutely no reason why this article can't be called Charles DeGaulle--I will gladly change my vote to For provided this is done. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:50, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. There's another article about this guy, titled Charles de Gaulle. You might want to delete that and just use this permanently. InMooseWeTrust 23:44, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
19:50, February 24, 2010 (UTC)