| Vote
|
Score: -4 poop poop poop pooop
|
| Nominated by:
|
Roman Dog Bird 22:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
For: 1
|
- Nom and For poop poop poop pooop --Roman Dog Bird 22:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- Against. Why I bothered to put forth the energy into voting against, I know not. This thing hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell anyway. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 22:42 Aug 29, 2007
- Against--Sir Manforman
 00:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- STRONG AGAINST! Oh my God. What the hell is going on? I have had enough of these crappy one-off pages going into a legitimate voting stage. I have just had it! VFH isn't a goddam mockery! Uncyclopedia isn't Illogicopedia! We feature pages with HUMOROUS CONTENT! Failing that, we feature pages WITH MILDLY HUMOROUS CONTENT! Note the common thread here: CONTENT!!!!! We are not a place for retarded one-trick pages that haven't a lick of effort to their name. I think we should seriously consider making nominating pages like this a bannable offense.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- QVFD Ж Kalir potentially sexier than you 00:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- And people wonder why I want to make Satiropendium. ~
 Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 30/08/2007 @ 00:14
- QVFD If we're quick about it, we can get a deleted article on VFH! EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 00:24, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
