Uncyclopedia:VFH/Concision

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Concision (history, logs)

Score: 3 abridgment

Nominated by:

Dark Web, White Hat (talk) 06:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

For: 3
  1. For. I find the linguistic humor delightful and well-written. Among other things, it exaggerates the tongue-in-cheek irony of Strunk & White's advice on brevity. Dark Web, White Hat (talk) 06:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
  2. For. Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
  3. For. Due to my crippling ego issues - that is to say, my on-going battle with excessive self-esteem, Sog1970 (talk) 09:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Against: 0
Comments:
  • Of course, Sog's bad writing is well-written, but I found it mechanical to pursue a comedy strategy of writing about concision by doing the opposite. I get the whole point halfway into the Intro. Spıke 🎙️11:55 8-Apr-22
Isn't that kind of the point? Sog1970 (talk) 12:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH