Uncyclopedia:VFH/Atlas Shrugged

Vote	Score: 0 John Galt, John Galt, John Galt
Nominated by:	Le Cejak • <16:13 Jun 03, 2009>
For: 3	Clemens177 wrote an article that is the epitome of what we're trying to do here: Encyclopedic style, actually gives information, funny... All around good article. Clemens177 reminds me of someone. Without Clemens177, where would we be? All DEAD, that's where! Le Cejak • <16:13 Jun 03, 2009> For. I have read this and the Galt article. Besides the lack of images and perhaps a few jumps in the text, I find it difficult to fault. It does presume perhaps that a reader will be familiar with the subject which is perhaps the main problem. Are we suggesting only 'Sonic the Hedgehog and lower' style articles can make it on Uncyclopedia ? It's a conundrum - if not a condom - of an idea to wrestle with. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 08:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC) Weak For**. The explanation kinda leaves a foul taste in my mouth. -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:57, 6 Jun
Against: 3	Against. Sorry, but yeah. I gave this a read, and messaged Clemens about it about a week or two ago, suggesting that he put it up for Pee and give it some polish. Though it has been reviewed, there's been almost no polish from when I first looked at it weeks ago. The article title isn't bolded, there's not nearly enough quality images, and the article jumps between actually (and accurately) satirizing the book to using random, non sequitor humor (i.e., "she put a curse on her husband's penis"). Don't get me wrong--I like this article--but until it gets the polish it needs my vote well be a resolute against. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Article title now sufficiently bolded. My day is shot. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC) You bolded it wrong! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC) Smite. Somewhat per Guildy, but I like it less than he does.. Don Puttano cHeDDs 01:48,7June,2009 01:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC) Against. needs cleanup. It shouldn't be featured in an ugly state. I also dislike the idea of significantly altering an article while its on VFH, I would suggest cleaning it up then renomming it. Mnb'z 03:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments:	Yeah, I see what you're saying, Guildy. It's still well-written in most parts, though. Le Cejak • <17:51 Jun 03, 2009> Gonna wait a bit. I don't mind a bit of non-sequitor humour, but it could use some more images and a bit of polishing. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Never read Atlas Shrugged, and reading the article leaves me againstful. But I'll abstain on the grounds that I know nothing about frickin' John Galt or Ayn Rand. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:50, Jun 4 Abstain. Too funny to vote against. Needs polish. pillow talk 20:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)