From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 16 ants needed per square pound in order to have a successful-- look, I have the conversion charts right here- /flips through some papers covered in blood I'll be with you in a second, hold on- /rifles through the necronomicon Uh, look, here's the scoop: this article is the worst thing ever.
|
| Nominated by:
|
Le Cejak • <9:11 May 29, 2009>
|
For: 17
|
- Whoa Le Cejak • <9:11 May 29, 2009>
 For.. Truly horrific! Dame   13:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)- My Mormon self reviles in horror. "What have I done?!" SelfFor. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:30, May 29
- Baby hole. Yup. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN15:34, 29 May
- For. It isn't perfect, but it's still an excellent rewrite. Saberwolf116 15:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. per above. Mnb'z 18:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Disgusting. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 01:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- whoa this used to kinda suck but necropaxx made it all cool awesome --Roman Dog Bird 01:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. MagaMaga 02:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 02:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes! —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. This article is amazing. rofl Lefaid 08:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. Great! IronLung 09:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- For User:Zeitgeist/sig 20:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Foar Am I late? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool
 11:08 June 3 '09
 How Did I Not Vote Yet?  Don   Puttano cHeDDs       23:14,3June,2009 23:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
 Against. Yes it was extemely well written and even linked to one of my articles, it just didn't make me laugh. Sorry. :/ ~Orian57~  ~Talk~  05:46 2 June 2009
|
| Comments:
|
- Abstain It's definitely a good article, and there's no way I would vote against, but it just didn't make me laugh. Staircase CUNt 17:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain It isn't badly written or has another major flaw I just went ewwww rather than lololololol. Also the 9/11 part is very losable. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     04:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 Abstain. A reluctant abstain. I like the crazy idea and execution but it is a bit of a 'hmmmm' one for me. May reconsider. --Romartus 17:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)- Abstain. It's a very good article, but similar to DJ Irreverent, I was kind of like Yuk! rather than Hah! Nameable ((talk?)) 20:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
