Talk:What to do if you've killed someone
Wow, that isn't at ALL funny, did you not understand this is a 'comedy' site not a site for random morons to spunk on about their boring as shit views. Managing to not be at all funny while making a uncyclopedia page like this requires determination. presumibly people you meet in everyday life have told you that you "are about as funny as the holocaust" and "shit, i would rather have colonic irrigation with a blowtorch than listen to this cunt again, i may fake my own death to get rid of this cunt"
Yo, whoever wrote this ^ is dumb.
The gradually diminishing quality of this article[edit]
This article just by reading the intro and looking at the formatting seems to me to scream out for attention despite the fact that it could be so funny if cleverly and encyclopedically written. At the moment it attracts one bad IP after another to add on a mildly-funny, retarded point onto the long list that has nothing to do with the article at all. I may have a try at fixing it later but I encourage others to have a bash at it. Personally I think it needs a complete re-write. Sir ScottPat (talk) 
VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:56, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
Well, you tried.[edit]
I can't say the page is the best I've ever seen, but at the same time, its not the worst. Yes, Lady Gaga, I'm looking at you.
The idea itself is unoriginal. Although the idea itself is not tasteless or done to death, the joke was executed poorly with this article.
While uncyclopedia is known to be a subtle book of sex, fire and cactus jokes, this doesn't mean the humour in the article should be invisible, or hard to find funny.
If you like the article, don't feel bad, perhaps the muse is absent today... --MrRatermat2 (talk) 22:45, December 13, 2013 (UTC)