Talk:Transformers

Mine! -- Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia|wanna Talk? 05:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

This movie opened June 28th in Australia. Suck on that!

Hey! Grrrrrrr!--24.176.12.20 10:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Erm, the Dinobots wont be in RoTF. And blah blah blah.

---

TALK FROM THE IMPERIAL COLONIZATION OF THIS ARTICLE BEGINS HERE

This is the discussion page for the Colonization. The current Colonization project is Transformers. Let's hear your thoughts. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:46, 16 Sep

Actually, I'm more interested in your thoughts. You being the expert and all, or so I assume. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:53, 16 September 2009

What if we put some biographies of the robots in a saddening, human form? it worked for Godzilla.-Almost Sir Random Crap

I'm willing to help with this as far as spilling and grammar it's to make real good, maybe checking out a couple things. But I'm afraid that's about it--I'm not a fan of Transformers because you can't tell what they are until they take their clothes off. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:07, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Marching Orders

NOTE: this section was moved from Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization to clean up that page.

We've got a winner. Even though I nominated this one, I've really no idea how we should preceed. Not only that, but since I'm a fan I'm afraid I may be too close to this to come up with a concept that isn't fancruft. So I'm counting on you guys' help. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:33, 16 Sep

Any colonizers paying attention to this, you have until December 18th to make your finishing touches on this page, or finish it altogether. I don't know. But either way, Transformers is either getting mainspaced or scrapped on the 18th. Good luck. FUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK! 00:56, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

In the words of King Arthur, 'Good idea, Colin "All your base" Heaney!' Well, his Majesty actually said, 'Good idea, Lord!' but you get the idea.  Father WHY??? (confessions)  01:39, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

The 18th of December has come and gone. What's next? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 16:02, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

Apparently, nothing's next. As of 17 January 2010, this "one-week" project will have been here four months! On that date, unless someone has a good reason not to, I plan to move this to mainspace. (By the way, if you move an article to one that already exists, does it screw up the history somehow? Someone let me know how to do this right before I screw something up--or go ahead and do it yourself. I won't mind). Happy editing! WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 20:38, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

I posted a version of the above both here on the talk page for the article, and no one's objected, so I'm moving it. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:38, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Amendment: moving an article to a space where an article already exists looks pretty complicated and thus like something I'm going to check with an admin on, so will check first. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:45, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Gentlebots, start your alien engines

Ideas, anyone? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 23:46 September 17 '09

Transformers as Transvestites or Transsexuals? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 06:03, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

• For. Brilliant idea Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 10:52 September 18 '09

  I realized I unintentionally ripped that idea off from Miley Spears--she had Brooke Shields playing Suddenly Susan as an instantly transforming transsexual. Give credit where credit is due. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 07:16, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

  I had the idea for Suddenly Susan not for here. You had it here. :) DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 02:14, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

  For: Definitely a great idea:) I'll be here to help with grammar, spelling, and the like. I'm pretty good with that. --Aladdin Sane 21:56, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Recruited by the Military or Mafia? -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 03:52, September 20, 2009 (UTC)

Spoof on the requirement to say TRANSFORM before each and every transformation? -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 03:54, September 20, 2009 (UTC)

Is anything happening here? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:42, 28 September 2009

Perhaps those who voted for might benefit from a gentle reminder. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 18:20, September 30, 2009 (UTC)

Good idea Whyner. I'll put reminders on all their talk pages. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:26, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

• For: I suppose I ought to vote for my own original idea I completely ripped off. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:35, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

Seriously

We have to get started on this.-Almost Sir Random Crap

Then do it? Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 01:35, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

I'm posting a reminder

I'm posting this on the talk page of every user who voted for.

On Uncyclopedia:Imperial_Colonization you voted for Transformers. As it says, "Vote for any and all nominations you plan to participate in." It's great you're going to participate! You can see ideas for the article and post your own at Uncyclopedia_talk:Imperial_Colonization/project. The article begins at Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/project. Thank you for agreeing to work on the article! --Imperial Colonization Fifth Undersecretary of Transformers.

DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:38, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

It has begun

Ok I started the article. What I wrote may totally suck but we have to start now or forget it. Here's why I wrote what I wrote:

• Some people seem to like Transformers as transsexuals
• Transformers really did begin in 1984 when the American Federal Communications Commission first allowed cartoons based on toys, and was an America-Japanese co-production
• Dakko-Chan was and is the mascot for Takara Co., Ltd. which made the toys, and he looked like a golliwogg (a black African based character that became unpopular because it was seen as being racist)
• "Little Boy" really is the name given to the bomb the Enola Gay dropped on Hiroshima in 1945
• The 1984, Oceania and Eastasia part is from George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four
• If you don't like what I wrote, fix it, change it, write something completely different. But whatever you do, they'll be something here! :) DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 05:15, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

hi, miley! PLS's up so everyone's gonna write something, and i seriously doubt that anybody is going to contribute to IC, so lets just just leave this IC project till after PLS.. and in the meanwhile, why dont you write something for PLS and maybe win yourself 20 bucks? :) • FreddThe Redd • • • 10:16 October 6 '09

Yeah, I think putting it on hold might be a good idea (although I think it's been on hold too long already). Can you really win 20 bucks for putting in only, say, 10 hours work on an article? Wow, such a deal! WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:36, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

Who's the fool who made that comment above? Oh, was that me? Sorry about that. By the guidelines for these things, this article should already be finished. Telling editors who want to work on it "No, you'd better not write anything on it because the rest of us will be off trying to win an award" seems rather ungood in retrospect. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 01:26, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

It was more like, put it on hold so that we (that's me, optimuschris, my mommy and his mommy.. and other users and their mommies) can participate in this IC project after we finish our PLS projects (opty and his mommy are starting theirs later this week) It's quite simple actually, there was no need for the critic/sarcastic tone • FreddThe Redd • • • 23:13 October 9 '09

Um, if you read my comment again, you'll find I was talking about myself. If I'm being self-critical or self-sarcastic, can I file a complaint against myself? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:32, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

I'm new here so don't know how this works. Was there a vote on putting it on hold that I missed, or is there someone who's in charge of IC who makes those decisions for us? And if somebody does edit the article, is that cause for censure or blocking by an admin? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:35, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

A couple things

First off, I think we should put this on hold until after PLS, as the right honorable Mooshy mentioned. Secondly, Transformers as transexuals is a terrible idea. We can do better than this guys. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:28, 6 Oct

What about a Transformers underclass who change from robots into things like Vauxhall Corsas, Hot Air Baloons and cross-channel ferrys?mAttlobster. (hello) 22:40, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

What about the motivations for changing into other things? Is it because of their empty jobs and they just like have fun at the weekends? Do they change because it's what society expects. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matt lobster (talk • contribs)

Intriguing idea there, whoeveryouare. I think this bears further investigation. Also;

-OptyC Sucks! CUN23:17, 6 Oct

Congratulations, OptyC, you fucked up this page's graphics. Way to go!-Almost Sir Random Crap

My work here is done. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:21, 6 Oct

I fixed it. My work here is done. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:23, 6 October 2009

Back to the matter at hand. Personally, I think this article should tell about the robots in a tone like Godzilla's article. Any thoughts?-Almost Sir Random Crap

I was thinking something along the same lines. Maybe a "where are they now" type article. But I really am intrigued by Matt's idea about what motivates them to transform. Could turn out pretty cool, or it could be extremely difficult. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:33, 6 Oct

Okay, let's do it.-Almost Sir Random Crap

Possible Ideas

• Do younger Transformers get pressured into following their father's footsteps. Is Daddy upset when junior becomes an aeroplane after a long family history of haulage?
• Or maybe on the transexual theme, the Transformers are born as who they are but maybe have identity issues. Has one that converts into a helicopter always felt like a Ferrari. Can they have some kind of vehiculer change operation?

  I think this idea has definite potential. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 05:44, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

• What did Transformers change into before the Industrial Revolution?

  If they were created during a nuclear attack on Hiroshima as it's written now, this is a non-issue. If not, it may be. But personally, I think trying to make transformers pre-industrial will tend to complicate this article. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 05:42, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

• Do they change for the first time at puberty? Is changing for the first time the human equivililent of shaving for the first time?

  I like this. Fits the classsic change at puberty theme. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 05:40, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

• Do they resent being judged by which vehicle they change into? Do they want to be judged on who they are inside. Do some of them refuse to transform for this reason?

  Can they help transforming? Could it be one of them tries not to transform, but just can't help it? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 05:44, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

mAttlobster. (hello) 11:24, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

• Along the line of identity issues: Do they have "color envy" - ie, he's a red Transformer but always wanted to be green?

-- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 05:44, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

I've made a few of the suggested changes and more or less rewritten the article to include almost all of the stuff that was already there. Main things that still need doing are the 'Reasons for Transforming' area, which needs more reasons and the ones that are there need (re)writing, a section about the new movies, a couple more pictures and possibly the adding of more robots. Personally I think it's not a half-bad article now, though, but it might benefit from including a few of the nice ideas detailed on this page... UnwiseOwl 03:53, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Japan vs Cybertron

Looks like we have a version conflict between a couple groups of writers. I like the Cybertron version better because it is closer to the actual, and is less likely to be offensive to Japanese and Japanese transexuals. Offensive is not always funny. That's my opinion, anyway. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 02:30, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

Also, the whole Japan thing was random and juvenile. Unless someone can come up with a betterer concept, we're going with Matt's suggestion. Approach the article as if Transformers were real. Colin has expressed interest in writing the fetishism section, and I'm thinking I'm gonna take a wack at the oedipal section. Further suggestions are always welcome. We need a better intro to tie it all together if someone wants to give that a shot. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:26, 9 Oct

"The whole Japan thing was random and juvenile." "Further suggestions are always welcome." Can somebody explain to me how these statements work together? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 21:33, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

Further suggestions are always welcome, with the exception of (overly) random and juvenile stuff. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:54, 9 October 2009

Also; just because it's suggested doesn't neccessarily mean it's going to be acted upon. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:01, 9 Oct

Socky, at least three people liked the idea. I doubt they found it "random and juvenile" WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:24, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

And what are you basing that assumption on? Why don't you listen to the more experienced users here. I'm sure your "mommy" wouldn't want you to argue with the adults. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:33, 9 Oct

The history shows people like the idea of transformers as transsexuals and so does the discussion above. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 00:21, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

One of my best friends is Japanese. I'll ask her if she feels it's offensive. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 00:25, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Infighting

I'm new here, but I'm wondering if one of the major problems IC has had is infighting. We have an article that by the IC plan would have been finished weeks ago. But so far what we have are editors reversing each others edits. I tried to make a compromise, but it appears some don't want to compromise. Rather pointless in a group effort, isn't it? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 21:30, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

No. A compromise only makes for a compromised article. Also, thanks for the suggestion that you might know what the "problem" is with IC after you've been a member for almost ten minutes. IC has ebbs and flows just like the rest of Uncyclopedia. Always has, always will. Stop trying to create drama where there is none. You don't like it, you don't have to be a part of it. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:59, 9 Oct

I'm actually supporting you with that one, OptyC! I can't believe it! Anyway, I think we should hold this off just a little bit longer. a lot of people and I have a PLS entries they urgently need to finish. Of course, you could object.-Almost Sir Random Crap

If you're opposed to compromising, would you mind telling me why you're participating in Imperial Colonization? 'Imperial Colonization is a usergroup that chooses a new article each week to improve. It's a sort of mass collab, kind of like Wikipedia's "Collaborations".' Collaboration involves compromise. Actually, Uncyclopedia itself involves compromise. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:16, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

No. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:19, 9 Oct

Also, please read what I typed below. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:20, 9 October 2009

Excuse, me, "Why?" I do believe you're only one month old and you still have "a mommy" for a user.. I know, you do great Pee reviews, but that's it. Face facts. You are not an admin. You're a great, productive, funny, user, just back off and shut up. Uncyclopedia hates complaining, and so do Conservatives.-Almost Sir Random Crap

Thanks for the compliment on my Pee Reviews. You're absolutely right, it's time for me to back off and shut up. (And by the way, I'm new here, but have been editing Wikis since 1999, which means I should definitely know better than to let myself be drawn into this sort of thing. Don't be a fool, Why?! Listen to BS!) WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:32, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

I detect extreme reverse sarcasm. Are you playing mind games again? Internet people hate mind games.-Almost Sir Random Crap

The problem was that your "compromise" was terribly one-sided, reinstituting the definition of Transformers as transsexuals. The point OptyC raised was that the transsexuals idea was bad to begin with, with which I quite agree. That is to say, it's a bad concept to base the complete Transformers article on. Basically the only humor would be "You were expecting to find an article on robots, but instead you found one on transsexuals. HAHAHA!" Which is far too limited in my opinion. Now, some transsexual-related issues might be of relevance to the article (see Matt's suggestions) and perhaps you could make a section treating the issue of male robots transforming into feminine vehicles and vice versa, but at least make the transsexual theme less obvious. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:05, 9 October 2009

To clarify, I didn't vote for this article, never had a Transformers toy, haven't seen the Transformers movie, and generally left the room when my family wanted to watch Transformers on TV. I really had no plans to work on this article, but wanted to at least do something as an IC applicant and saw an edit war beginning. If you don't like what I did, that's fine. But I think unless you start working together you're either going to lose people or have a major edit war on your hands. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:22, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

Your opinion has been noted. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:26, 9 Oct

Again, all you're doing is starting drama. Seems to run in the family. Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START!

Indeed. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:30, 9 Oct

I've only done one IC which was God. But on that we disagreed but before it got to an edit war we worked it out and made a good article out of everybody's ideas. I think we can do that here too. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 00:23, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

And if not, a third party unaffiliated with IC will step in and use his mad rewriting skills to fuck up all of y'all's work. Am I making myself clear? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:26, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Sort of. -OptyC Sucks! CUN13:27, 10 Oct

Barack Obama on Transformers

“To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures....” “I will accept this award as a call to action, a call to all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st century.”

(This is an actual quote by American President Barack Obama upon winning the Nobel Peace Prize on 9 Oct. 2009. This might be useful in the article). http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28129.html WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 00:06, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Where they from, when they from?

• In relation to this article, did Transformers come into being in 1984, or did they just first appear on Earth in that year?

If they originated on Earth, then I'd say they came into being on 1984. If they're from Cybertron, then I'd say they first appeared on Earth that year--depends on which way people want to go. I'm OK with either one. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 16:33, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

• Do they mainly live on Cybertron still? Are the toys and tv/movies just our depiction of them? mAttlobster. (hello) 15:24, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

If we go with them as robot people, I'd say maybe most people on Cybertron are simply robots that don't change--the transformers were cast out and ended up on Earth for being different. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 16:34, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

That's pretty much exactly what I was going for. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:08, 22 Oct

Please let us know when we can go back to editing the article

Thanks. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 19:16, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Why can't you now?mAttlobster. (hello) 20:41, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Because Optimuschris said I/we should wait until after he's finished judging PLS. He said those of us who aren't busy with PLS should wait until those who are working on it are finished. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 20:58, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

My fault, I didn't make myself clear. Go ahead and work on it. I just meant that we shouldn't plan on finishing it before PLS was over so those who wanted to participate could do so as well without having to split their attention between the two projects. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:07, 22 Oct

All right, sorry if I misunderstood. My contributions will probably be minimal as I know almost nothing about Transformers. But I'd be happy to help with speeling and grammar that ain't no good. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 21:22, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Also, just a reminder, Colin has expressed interest in doing the Fetish section. I think he has an idea in mind for it. Not that you shouldn't feel free to work on it in case he never gets around to doing it, but if he does I don't want anybody to have their feelings hurt if he changes everything you've already written there. :) -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:37, 23 Oct

Question

If I contribute majorly to the project, and it becomes featured, do I get credit and get raised to CUN, along with the fancy Mr. Potatohead blue featured article template on my page?-Almost Sir Random Crap

Everyone who participates gets a half credit if the article goes on to become featured. I believe (though it's been a while since I looked at the requirements) that you need a full featured article credit to be promoted to CUN. So, if you participate in two IC's that get featured, you're golden. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:44, 23 Oct

Well my world domination article didn't become featured, only the featured HowTo (Whether or not this counts as half or any credit, I don't know), so if Transformers becomes featured (which is questionable right now), I guess I could become CUN. But that's my theory. As you can see, I'm no Socrates.-Almost Sir Random Crap

It doesn't count for anything unless it goes through the VFH process. You'll get there eventually Shroomer. :) -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:51, 23 Oct

Two articles are through the VFH already! How come I didn't get one? |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 10:20, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Just when you thought I had some sense I go and open my mouth

I couldn't help but notice that several people were starting to work on the Transformers article a few weeks ago. Then there was a little revert warring, followed by some insults on people's talk pages, and some people were told on talk pages not to edit it until PLS was over. So people stopped editing, and now that PLS has been over for a while, nothing's happening. So I was wondering if, maybe, insulting people and their edits and then telling them not to edit wasn't such a great idea for a collaborative effort? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 23:22, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Why don't you keep your damn mouth shut. Sometimes you can be such an ass. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 01:25, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Transformers should be split into Cartoon(s) and Movie(s)

...with the deference being weather it was animated or not. What do you think? ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  03:23, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

MOVING THIS TO MAINSPACE

On 17 January 2010, this "one-week" project will have been here for FOUR MONTHS! As per the suggestion of others, unless anyone strongly objects, on 17 January 2010 I plan to move this to main space. Maybe Imperial Colonization can begin on something else. Otherwise, we'll end up fighting an endless, unpopular war like what King George had with the American colonists. I've referring to King George W. Bush, of course.  Father WHY??? (confessions)  20:48, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

, Looking for-ward to the new project.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  14 Jan 2010 ~ 08:17 (UTC)

Also if I just move this, will it screw up the history or something? If someone knows how to do it right, let me know or go ahead and do it.  Father WHY??? (confessions)  20:40, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

I Believe it requires the intervention of somebody with admin powers.

UnwiseOwl 22:36, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

Admins? We don't need no stinkin' admins! (Seriously, I'm open to suggestions). Also Brother UnwiseOwl, welcome to the church, even if your sig currently has a break in it.  Father WHY??? (confessions)  02:33, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

I posted 10 days ago I planned to move this unless someone told me it was a bad idea. No one's told me that, so I'm assuming it's not a bad idea. If I do something that screws something up, I'm also assuming someone will fix it. I think most if not all of us would agree this has been here way too long. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:31, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Amendment: moving an article to a space where an article already exists looks pretty complicated and thus like something I'm going to check with an admin on, so will check first. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:43, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

MrN9000 fixed it. You can tell from the name he's a Transformer, or at least a robot. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 23:38, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

TALK FROM THE IMPERIAL COLONIZATION OF THIS ARTICLE ENDS HERE

Fucking colonizers...

You people scare me. --Matfen 21:29, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

Who put his what in the where now? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:41, 31 January 2010

If you're frightened it's because you're a native who's afraid to be colonized, what? Do not be afraid. Before you know it you'll be Lord or Lady Muck driving your lorry home for tea time and to watch the cricket on the telly. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 03:38, February 1, 2010 (UTC)