Talk:New Somalia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the New Somalia article. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that. For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

		This article was nominated for deletion on September 26, 2009. The result of the discussion was Keep.

		This article was nominated for deletion on December 30, 2014. The result of the discussion was Keep.

From Pee Review

either this or wikocracy, the idea has TREMENDOUS potential.

I agree. The idea of a country anyone can edit is great. The article at this point only focuses on the law sections. I might add a piece on editing culture, topography, climate, etc. A background section or history section would be good, too. Maybe you could look at Wikipedia's own Wikipedia entry for ideas. Anyway, just some thoughts. It's a good idea, which automatically makes it better than a number of articles created here.--Procopius 21:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

This article's Pee Review

Humour:	7	cute, funny in places... I think the "eradication" stuff comes on way too heavy though. More objective "observational" tone would underscore the dry humor. Also, while food/fat is certainly worthy of being in here (grin), think about branching out a little- child-bearing, PTAs, Junior League, suburban sprawl... all topics worthy of being picked on!
Concept:	8	good concept, and definitely needs to be in Uncyclopedia. Well organized; just needs to take a broader shot at its target!
Prose and formatting:	8	generally well-written, easy to follow. Latin names-- well, a little more subtlety would suit me, but might strike others another way. The more multisyllabic and pretentious the writing, though, I think the funnier the article would be-- particularly when you're speaking of trailer trash!
Images:	10	magnificent job. That Flava Flav pic, in particular, was a serious crack-up. :)
Miscellaneous:	8.3	good balance of text and pics, flows well... just think about taking more well-deserved potshots at the target, and might want to toss in the odd thing about Bush as well (always a chuckle).
Final Score:	41.3	th...th...th... that's all folks! Hope it helps-- very solid start you're working with there. :)
Reviewer:	—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.125.13.160 (talk • contribs)