Talk:Do NOT Delete this Article

????!!!??!?!?!??!

This Article was Quasi-Featured and its stamped with NRV!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT THE HELL????--Witt E, 21:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

*draws another chalkline* --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H|UotM|+S 21:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Heh heh heh. Just imagine if it was really featured... man, that'd be freaking mindblowing!   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

We COULD feature it... --Micoolio101 23:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101

That would ruin Tompkins's already fragile brain further. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Question...

is it all right to delete part of the article?

NO! —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 01:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

One More Question...

ANY of the article? One word? Deleting it but not saving the changes?

Guess. --My page is broken? ^{(Yes, dumbass! Get to it!)} 13:41, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Save this poor SOB

This article should stay. Don't kill it! The dang thing if actually rather funny. --Ggarfield 06:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Boring!

Thank you Tompkins, Hinoa, Electrostatic, Dawg, et al. for making such a terrible article. You should work for the idiots at MAD TV—not to be confused with the idiots at Mad Magazine, who are not really idiots.—Aybabtu 23:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)