Forum:Two new sysops

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Two new sysops

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6731 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

VOTE CONCLUDED

Note to Bureaucrats: Please wait 48 hours before adminning anyone. The last election for multiple sysops saw the first sysoppings less than 10 hours later. This doesn't give everyone a chance to vote.

Sikon

Guest (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +11.5

Opped —rc (t) 19:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. --KATIE!! 16:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For....long overdue. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 17:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - definately. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Actual For.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 17:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• 1/2 Against. For creation of the title hacks (which broke with sitenotice, or in other skins), I don't think he should be messing with site-wide CSS/JS yet. --Splaka 02:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For... wait, he isn't already?--<<>> 03:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• 1/2 Against for the same reasons as Splaka. --Algorithm 03:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Long overdue for. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 04:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. He owes me a favor, and somebody can always revert his CSS hacks.  c • > • cunwapquc? 05:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For--Rataube 09:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. again, I don't even know if this vote counts... but I'd say he's a well deserving candidate, and you're supposed to learn from your mistakes, I'm sure he has :) --Olipro Anchor (Harass) 19:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Lots of experience. Doesn't like Opera though. :/ —rc (t) 06:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• 1/2 For 08:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Da for Comrade Sikon. *restrains urge to make hackneyed 'Soviet Russia' gag* -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 09:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • To Splarka and Algorithm: I publicly vow not to touch CSS and JS. I have Wookieepedia to experiment with. - User:Guest/sig
• Strong For. Sheer brilliance. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 16:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Sannse

Sannse (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

• Formality. --KATIE!! 16:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Sannse, the Wiki Queen. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 17:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against as, if staff already have bureaucrat powers, this is a pointless nomination. --Carlb 17:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • It's a go ahead and mess up our wiki, we won't rise up in an angry mob against you nomination. --KATIE!! 07:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against, As per ^. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Faux For.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 17:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

So is that an against? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

No, it's just kind of there...   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 19:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Neutral. On the one hand, it's a bit soon... she hasn't been here long enough yet. On the other, cool!

Just a note: as staff, I don't do routine admin tasks for a wiki with active sysops - except in an emergency of course. I'm not going to interfere with the people here already doing what's needed (ignore the few things I've done - mostly that was just because I was in a silly mood). So being an admin here would make a difference to what I do. -- sannse<staff/> (talk) 21:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• For, she can do anything a sysop can do already, might as well make it official. --Splaka 02:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For honorary measures and comment: I believe Sannse has only blocked someone once, and that was only because all the other admins at the time WERE LAZY AND DIDN'T CHECK IRC! (Note: I wasn't sysop at the time.) Let this be a reminder: Wikia staff does, in fact, care about black people Uncyc. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 04:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against.  c • > • cunwapquc? 05:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. But please Sannse, change that horrible signature of yours. --Rataube 09:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment This doesn't make sense to me. People are saying this is a formality, but by Sannse's own statement being made a bona-fide Uncyc admin would make a difference to what she does, and adminning Uncyc is, I daresay, rather different from other wikis. Not that she doesn't have what it takes, but I think it's a bit early in her Uncyc career. —rc (t) 06:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I trust sannse. 07:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Might as well get the formalities done, but the symbolic appointement of Sannse to Admin should require than she becomes quite active in admin tasks, as the point is that she is taking up a space that could be used for someone else. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 15:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks for the votes people -- sannse<staff/> (talk) 21:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Against I've only heard of her (?) through image realted pages (VFP, Rad's Corner...) --ZB 21:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Sbluen

Sbluen (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• For. Hard worker, good spotter of crap. --Algorithm 04:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Sbluen seems like a promising up-and-comer and I would be happy to throw my support behind his/her opping after some time. It hasn't been that long yet, though. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 05:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Spang

Spang (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

Opped —rc (t) 19:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. I like the cut of his jib. Also, this page needed more usernames starting in S. --Algorithm 04:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I suppose. He acts like it already. --Splaka 04:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. He's already racked up over a thousand edits in less than three months, much of which seem to be attempts to clean up messes left by others and not attempts at User:Spang/World domination. --Carlb 04:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 05:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good choice - he's young, fast, and scientific. (Btw, my user name begins with an "S," but I'll just have to settle for this guy while I wait for Hell to freeze over!)  c • > • cunwapquc? 05:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Erm... why not? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 06:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. He cleaned up the deadends that I tagged and I was too lazy to fix by myself. --Sbluen 22:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Water-powered For. Seems to know all about that technical stuff to which I plead ignorance. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 13:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I think he deserves it, and per an IRC discussion, is at worst a lesser of two evils :P --Olipro Anchor (Harass) 14:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I thought Spang was a Sysop... well Spang should be I guess.--Witt E, 03:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Ghelae

Ghelae (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -2

• For. Does alot of work on Unmeta, I feel he could provide the same help here... or just op him on unmeta... whatever.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. [insert reason here] --Splaka 05:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against 08:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. ~ T. (talk) 10:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Not yet. Promising though.--Rataube 13:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Maybe later. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 17:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For and Unmeta opping although for now it must stop there. --ZB 21:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment for anybody on who voted for my UnMeta opping, if you have an account on UnMeta, unless you already have done so, vote here (Down at the bottom, +4 votes already). ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Zombiebaron

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• For. Yep.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Nope. --Algorithm 05:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yep. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 06:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Still Against. I haven't noticed any changes in the ZB lately. 08:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I wouldn't vote for him to be opped (sorry!) but ZB has been quite helpful of late from what I've seen. —rc (t) 19:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• A Completly Serious For I think he deserves it, if only due to senority (hope I spelt that right). --ZB 21:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Rataube

Rataube (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

• For. Almost forgot... heh heh.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Another no-brainer.--<<>> 05:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It takes more to deserve being an admin than just being on the site a lot. --Algorithm 05:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. As you see, I'm just going for/against/for/against... anyway, I agree with ^. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 06:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I've always thought Rataube is one of the most reasonable and levelheaded users here (even when I disagree with him) and he has experience adminning the Spanish Uncyc already. My only concern is whether he would have the time to deal with both. —rc (t) 07:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. I didn't nominate because he's busy all the time. I'd vote for if he accepted. --KATIE!! 08:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 09:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ T. (talk) 10:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Quatro, er, four... if he's already a successful es:especial:listusers/sysop his qualification for the task is more than just "being on the site a lot". --Carlb 12:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Again, I feel honoured, thanks for the nomination and the support votes. However, for now, I'm too bussy with Spanish uncy and real life tasks.--Rataube 13:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Olipro

Olipro (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• For. Just throwing this one out there. Since he's the Czar of UnNews, I think he can help in other ways, too.--<<>> 02:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey Brad, uhh... here's the thing. I'm pretty sure voting ended. Good effort though, and way to stay sharp out there!   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 06:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

The voting NEVER ends... not so long as we have each other!--<<>> 13:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)