Uncyclopedia talk:Foolitzer Prize

The winner should be KUN, not GUN. There's just not that much competition for the award (yet). —rc (t) 23:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

I agree, same with the Emmanuel Goldstein award. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 23:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Goldstein's only CUN right now. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 23:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Even better. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 23:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

make 'em both the same. Maybe CUN makes sence. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I also agree the Foolitzer should be for KUN or CUN, but didn't feel it was my place to second-guess IWNH. I would also suggest demoting existing winners to the appropriate title because (a) I agree there's insufficient competition for such a huge rank raise, (b) for consistency with future winners, and (c) out of fairness for future winners. But mostly because of (a) :) Getting GUN is/was difficult, and rightfully so. ~ T. (talk) 01:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Since there's been no opposition I'm going to change the Foolitzer to KUN. —rc (t) 03:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, shouldn't this really be CUN? In line with most other awards? - [22:26 10 July] Sir FSt Don

Umm...[edit]

We have a tie this month, so... who wins? Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 00:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

I gave it to a hobo. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Now, really, there's no need to insult Rabbai Techno. Sir Not A Good Username360

KUN 19:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

There's no shame in being a hobo. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Is this over now? --Sir Sunbeam ~~no u~~ F@H KUN 16:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)