Welcome to the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing! (Amateur means we don't pay you to do it.)
This is where the original Uncyclopedia wound up. You might as well pick a user name. We have no "partners" that want to sell you stuff. Giving your email simply lets you recover your password; we don't send spam. Uncyclopedians get a talk page, private edit area, and a welcome, maybe, if you actually edit; and we won't de-platform you for your views, if they're funny.
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for Deletion.
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
Delete. - If Wikipedia doesn't want it, we most definitely don't want it. -LoudAb. (talk) 20:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete. This is not original comedy writing; it is serious documentation of a case where Wikipedia was pranked (perhaps funny to the prankster). Not what our encyclopedia is for. My comment below did not mean I thought this article was any good. Spıke 🎙️12:21 2-Apr-21
Delete. A joke that long lost its topicality. All that's left is this. -- RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete. Sog1970 (talk) 15:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Nominator's rationale is false. This is not Wikipedia's article on Elephant but news about that article, also Colbert's citation of the article, also an edit war at Wikipedia. I presume author Sikon was one of those banned from editing on Wikipedia and wanted to even the score or tell his story at Uncyclopedia.
Less clear now that nominator has deleted the Wikipedia AfD (VFD) notice, which was the only thing approaching humor. Spıke 🎙️21:02 23-Mar-21
- Okay, I get it (after deleting the article): At one point during the vandalism, the Wikipedia article pointed to this Uncyclopedia article, which pointed back to it, hence our "recursive" Colbert photo. This is conundrum, not comedy. Also, it is no longer true. Spıke 🎙️16:36 2-Apr-21
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
Delete. Racist, repetitive, not very funny. Dark Web, White Hat (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete. That, and meme-cruft, Wacky War, and a rant about George W. Bush. Spıke 🎙️10:15 2-Apr-21
Delete. No one would miss it. Sog1970 (talk) 10:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete. Bin it. -- RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete. -LoudAb. (talk) 13:27, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
Delete. Also {{Wikiapar}}. As wikia.com cut us loose in 2019 (as set out in Section 7 of my user page), it is the website I am second most anxious not to send free traffic to. I believe both templates are used in less than a dozen articles. (A separate topic is whether we are doing anyone a favor by having some of our articles refer them to Conservapedia.) Spıke 🎙️20:02 4-Apr-21
Delete. I count 3 practical transclusions of the templates, only 2 in mainspace. Occasional Fandom links might be useful (e.g. is there a replacement for Bulbapedia as a free Pokemon resource not covered by Wikipedia?), but it would be easier to write a new template—the links in {{Wikia}} and {{Wikiapar}} are broken. Dark Web, White Hat (talk) 20:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete. When all roads led to Evil HQ. -- RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:43, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- I've edited the two callers and both templates are now orphaned in mainspace. Spıke 🎙️19:55 5-Apr-21
|