From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Montenegro (Slogan)
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. The subject of the page, you see, is "is a popular shout in the foreign language of Montedge, a language comprised mostly of gibberish in this author's head." Dreck from 2006. Spıke 🎙️01:26 21-Feb-16
- Delete. No pics, no real comedy hook EStop ⚓ 17:12, February 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. One of Uncyclopedia's deep well of junk articles. Remove. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:55, February 23, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The most interesting thing about this is how an IP article like this survived QVFD. --Nikau (talk) 11:27, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Radiohead
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. One section has any effort put in (which still isn't that funny). The rest is literal gibberish (of the keyboard-mashing variety) and song lyrics. ConCass2 (talk) 23:14, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. First line of this article tells you that it is funny, suggesting perhaps it isn't. It isn't. EStop ⚓ 16:57, February 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Authors who think a band's work is incoherent ought to have to do more than write an article of "imitative" incoherence. It might be possible to salvage Sections 1 and 12 and ditch the examples in which "the band's music speaks for itself," but even here, all you have is a contrived invention of Radiohead (a radio thrown toward the head) and plays on people's names. Start over! Spıke 🎙️17:35 21-Feb-16
- Delete. Apparently this has even been featured once! --PlaceHolderUserName My talk! 18:32, February 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Where? When? I don't see it. We are not supposed to VFD Featured Articles. Spıke 🎙️20:53 21-Feb-16
- It says "not featured" and it's a joke logo, but is obscured by the Uncyc potato. ConCass2 (talk) 22:03, February 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. As a fan, I think there are tiny parts here and there that are funny, but most of it is gibberish poorly masquerading as parody. --Nikau (talk) 11:25, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Manitoba
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. The article has two sections: listcruft by editors who know how to code lists, and listcruft by those who don't. Spıke 🎙️03:20 27-Jan-16
- Delete. It's a mess. Cg097 (talk) 04:05, January 27, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Concur. EStop ⚓ 06:52, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. That's it, back to Winnipeg! This article should never have been created.--PlaceHolderUserName My talk! 18:27, February 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Not much about anything here. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:10, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Actually there are a few salvageable parts, but most is pretty terrible. --Nikau (talk) 11:18, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Game:My Untune Hero and subpages
Game:My Picross and sub-pages
John Miles (musician)
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Has been around since 2006 in about the same form. Its only comedy strategy is self-reference, as though it were a parody of a typical bad article. Unfortunately, that also requires that it be a bad article, which it is. Virtually nothing links to it. Spıke 🎙️23:30 10-Feb-16
- Delete. Who? The Wikipedia article looks as thin as this (I suspect that's a vanity entry - perhaps this is to). --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:01, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal opinion like a blog, rather than encyclopedic information. EStop ⚓ 16:54, February 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. "He is so mindbogglingly unimportant that actually having an article written that even contains his name is hard to justify" - the article literally tells us that it should be deleted. ConCass2 (talk) 13:51, February 23, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
F.A.R.T.
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Who the heck is StrawberryClock? Cg097 (talk) 18:07, February 24, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. B-gone! EStop ⚓ 16:08, February 25, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. I've rewritten the Intro to give it an actual theme. Anyone else can flesh out the rest. Spıke 🎙️15:04 2-Mar-16
- Keep. It's got a coherent concept. --Nikau (talk) 07:22, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Someone has rewritten it into a pretty smart concept. ConCass2 (talk) 21:25, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Article has a few good comedy notions, unfortunately none of them developed nor connected, and the Intro that B is a notorious movie is forgotten once we move past the Table of Contents. It is not awful, however. It seems like a placeholder for the sake of completing the keyboard class of articles. Spıke 🎙️18:39 24-Feb-16
|
I.R. Baboon
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A shortish article "in the style of its subject," which would be a co-star from a cartoon TV show of at least 16 years ago. I am not familiar with the show but it is clear that this article has nothing to offer beyond fan-fiction. Spıke 🎙️03:53 25-Feb-16
- Delete. -- EStop ⚓ 16:11, February 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Believe it or not, an article written in the style of "mentally challenged baboon" does not have much potential. ConCass2 (talk) 10:51, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm amazed people think these things are worth writing. --Nikau (talk) 10:43, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. One for the bidet. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:29, March 8, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
The Drummer
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. If we remove the lists and unfunny jokes, there isn't enough left that can't be transported to the bigger article of drummer. ConCass2 (talk) 10:49, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Author (Anon in 2007) begins with the horrible cliche "is known for" and his very first comedy impulse is the irony of what he has just typed, as opposed to starting over. That will repel readers, if they are lucky. Beyond that, nominator is exactly right. Red-links everywhere is the sign of a work that author didn't bother to finish. Someone could perfect it, but better yet, start over, and the reader is still not going to look for an article with an inexplicable "The" at the start. Spıke 🎙️12:19 27-Feb-16
- Delete. A deep and rich percussive parody opportunity, played out on maracas. EStop ⚓ 10:46, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Drum out. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:38, March 8, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Should be lured into a snare, be kicked and possible have a crash. Drumroll please... --PlaceHolderUserName My talk! 19:15, March 8, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Auschwitz Theme Park
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. On the site since 2007, this article "it's self" starts with the predictable concept of giving Auschwitz a Pollyanna treatment. But it is nothing but an outline of concepts on particular amusements, in no case going beyond shock into actual clever humor; then devolves into lists. The only saving grace is the final line, added by RabbiTechno. Spıke 🎙️13:35 1-Mar-16
- Delete. What kind of sick person is amused by genocide? --PlaceHolderUserName My talk! 21:12, March 1, 2016 (UTC)
- I am not too amused by holocaust jokes either but plenty of people enjoy dark humour, it is not a valid reason to delete something. ConCass2 (talk) 11:59, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, as I told PHUN on his talk page, covering the gruesome with Pollyanna is one of the ideas HTBFANJS suggests to new writers, but it needs something more than this. Spıke 🎙️14:49 2-Mar-16
- Delete. Article is a few badly written sentences followed by a list of "amusements" (one-liner puns). But none of these concepts are developed into anything more than titles, they're just listed. ConCass2 (talk) 11:59, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It is achieveing only gross humour, not dark humour. EStop ⚓ 10:37, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Not sick enough to be clever. Just dumb. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:30, March 8, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Mint Aero
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Survived once in 2009, somehow. Is basically just a plot with no connection to the true movie, has nothing funny to say and reads like a schoolboy's creative writing. --Nikau (talk) 10:22, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Now has a History section, based on WP:Howard the Duck (film), which may make even the randomness of the following Plot section seem appropriate. Spıke 🎙️23:35 7-Mar-16
- Keep. Worth retaining. --PlaceHolderUserName My talk! 18:58, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It doesn't seem that awful after a little clean-up work. Spıke 🎙️12:44 7-Mar-16
- Reception is generic but cute. However, the movie's real-world reception was so atrocious (it is on people's lists of worst movies ever) that it deserves a really good Uncyclopedia article of how it got that way. Spıke 🎙️22:54 7-Mar-16
- You know why else this article has loads of potential? Well, wanna know?
- This movie was produced by George Lucas. Yep, him. The Star Wars dude, Lucasfilm...him. Seems to be a warning of what was to come... --PlaceHolderUserName My talk! 18:23, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
|
God/Unused
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Apparently this is reachable from the random page button (how I found it). Looks like a mess, even if it's a sub-page. --Nikau (talk) 04:24, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. This article has no raison d'être, merely being 'unused material'. And it's rubbish. Delete. --PlaceHolderUserName My talk! 08:56, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Randumbo. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:15, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Talented writer Jackali made me curious to find out why Nietzsche is a douzsche. Unfortunately, this page doesn't say at the outset where it is going, and I read a lot without finding out where it was going. Warehousing this assumes it isn't possible to write new material on the existence of God, some of which might even be funny. Spıke 🎙️13:43 6-Mar-16
- Delete. Seems pointless to me. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:24, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- I found the first section (about God saying "I don't exist" and someone way over-analysing it) to be kind of funny, but the next one seems like an in-joke (who the Hell is Jack?). I don't reckon that bit should be deleted outright - would the first section fit into the parent article? ConCass2 (talk) 14:36, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
- I think not; the parent article is a FA and "assumed not to need new help being funny." What is on the page under ballot is the out-takes. If you see something salvageable, grab it before it goes away. Spıke 🎙️00:38 7-Mar-16
- Just put that idea, which is admittedly funny, into an idea bank and then use it on another theistic article at a future date. --Nikau (talk) 10:45, March 7, 2016 (UTC)
|
Vestiphobia
Super Socialism
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. If anyone looks up Super Socialism, he gets this article about socialism as a Wacky Religion. List of tenets, list of commandments, list of dates, as though the author is not interested in writing and wants you to know it. Spıke 🎙️00:29 9-Mar-16
- Delete. Cut and...well, just cut, really. --PlaceHolderUserName My talk! 07:21, March 9, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:30, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Yawnsome. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:32, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Uncyclopedia:Uncyclopediholism test
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A listy non-policy page in the policy space, parodying an exam that we don't have in the first place. Spıke 🎙️14:15 10-Mar-16
- Test failed. --PlaceHolderUserName My talk! 18:27, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:38, March 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundo. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:41, March 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Interesting concept, but poorly executed. Expert 3222 21:18, March 25, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|