From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 10.5 Members of the Axis of Evil
|
| Nominated by:
|
Mn-z 04:55, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 13.5
|
- nom + 4 An article on the various enemies of the US. --Mn-z 04:55, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
- For real Mnbsrkbgfdgdjfjkdfkgdfkgjdfgdkfkgkdfgdf It's by Modus and therefore shits out awesome. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     10:02, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
- Modus! —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:40, 30 September 2009
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 10:51, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
- For, obviously. I'm from Easter Island. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:03, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Where's Iraq? I thought it was trinity? Anyway I vote yes, because it's not supposed to be satire, nor silly, it's supposed to be funny. And it is! Funnybony 19:15, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
- for. when VFH is slow, we apparently turn into moduspedia. this is a good thing. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:23, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
- Mork mork mork! Sweden. FEAR SWEDEN! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 05:01, Oct 1
- For. Countries that rhyme with "Bizreal". --UU - natter
 09:45, Oct 2
- For. modusopedia, you say • FreddThe Redd •
 •  • 13:17 October 2 '09
- For. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN23:48, 2 Oct
- For. Easter Island's motto would win a for on its own. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:14, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Sog1970 17:35, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
- For. hilarious 71.63.120.150 04:41, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
- Weak Against. It's pretty good, but it's very silly as opposed to very satirical, which is what the angle should be. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:10, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
- Against It didn't make me laugh. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:05, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
- Against very strong intro, but then a list article? Come on MO. --THINKER 10:00, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
Where is the LAW that Uncyclopedia article MUST be Satire, but NOT "Funny" or "Silly"? And WHAT exactly is the difference? How can an article be satire without being both silly AND funny? Is not FUNNY the trip? It might be a better idea to distinguish funny from funny, after all, there MUST be a difference between funny and funny!? And we can only use the RIGHT funny, otherwise it's off to the unRe-education camps.--Funnybony 19:54, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. The intro ought to be cut down or removed into the notes section.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 23:41, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. The only thing missing here is a bucket of bad puns. That would be hell-arious! JoeMonco 12:13, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
16:50, October 9, 2009 (UTC)