Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo: Be An Honest Crook

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

HowTo:Be An Honest Crook (history, logs)

Score: 12 criminals coming clean

Nominated by:

LongLiverh3 16:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

For: 16
  1. Nom and for. Posseses a heartfelt and thoughtful touch that I want to see more of on Uncyclopedia. --LongLiverh3 16:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Symbol for vote.svg Yeah  –  FuhQ.gifUser talk:Zana Dark  ZDsig.gifUser:Zana Dark Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 16:58, 9 May 2009
  3. Yup. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN17:34, 9 May
  4. For. I Pee Reviewed this one for Jonbob, and liked it. A good concept well executed. T. (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  5. Symbol for vote.svg For. Dishonesty is the second best policy. JackOfSpades (talk) 18:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  6. Honest For. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. --Docile hippopotamus 01:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  8. Yes Though I'm not a fan of that blood spatter image, I really like the rest so yeah. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb.png ~Talk~ Gay sign.png 04:07 10 May 2009
  9. Ankh smite.png Bless. so much. The la Zhel 11:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  10. Symbol for vote.svg For. User:Zeitgeist/sig 13:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  11. For per Docile Hippopotamus.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 16:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  12. Symbol for vote.svg For. A well thought out and informative manual; absolutely loved it ImNotASunbeam 07:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  13. Symbol for vote.svg For. Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 10:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  14. Weak For, because like DJ, 2nd person narrative has got to be good or it's just not. But I liked it a little more than he did. Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:12, May 11
  15. Go for it! Is it okay to vote for your own article? User:Jonbob0008 7:58, 14 May 2009
  16. For. Spang talk 03:58, 15 May 2009
Against: 4
  1. Meh It's got to be a fucking awesome "2nd person directing" article to make me vote. This wasn't quite there. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 06:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. per above. Mnb'z 16:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. against. not as per above, but as per not passing the chuckle test. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  4. Against. For me, this is on the way, and a decent idea, but somewhere short of the finished product. I like the idea, but the execution feels lacking at present. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:59, May 12
Comments:
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Abstain. I hovered between yes and abstain.Chose the latter for reasons that the article is in the right place but I don't think it is VFH,--Romartus 22:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
  • As always my vote is opinion but 2nd person narrative articles are quickly becoming like Chuck Norris facts to me. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 06:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  • i believe 2nd person narrative is nearly required for articles in the HowTo namespace. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
    I have to agree. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN14:23, 21 May

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH