From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 16 gun barrels poking out from around the corner
|
| Nominated by:
|
RAHB 14:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 17
|
- Nom and For -RAHB 14:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- For So the other day a bird crapped on my car. And by "a bird", I mean a hawk. Thing was huge. --monika 17:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Obvious For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Cameo For --Asahatter (annoy) 22:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- For! --Dame
  00:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Guildensternenstein 04:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- For Does my vote count? --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 05:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- jimmy stewart. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Excellent. Rabbi Techno
 kvetch  Contribs  FOXES 08:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- For --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Genius --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     10:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. ~
 11:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Brilliant. A high technical difficulty maneuver performed gracefully.--
   12:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Superb. Meta at its best. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:02, Apr 13
- For. Worthy of any parody collection. (Sorry, didn't realize I had been booted - I hope this works) -- Style
 Guide 18:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Very neatly done. --UU - natter
 14:30, Apr 14
- For. Kinda looks like it belongs in UnScripts, but still funny. -- Meta 500 02:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
- Sorry Man Hate to be the only Against voter, and I do think it's an excellently written article, but for some reason, it just doesn't make me laugh. It just seems too... ehh...--
 Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
 Abstain. Reluctant abstain but I think it needs a few illustrations .--Romartus 15:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Part of the satire of the article is that it's written in the form of a raw script, which is purely text and descriptions of visualizations. -RAHB 16:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes I can see that - my abstention on the grounds of 'Format interpretation' only.--Romartus 06:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- In relation to Romartus' comment, it may be possible to add a few 'hidden images' (animations which appear blank most of the time) in the background. It would conserve the present state of the article. Though it'd take a hell of a job to make such images. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- There are "hidden images" there already. -RAHB 05:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
