As a first-timer on Uncyclopedia, I want to see how to make this article funnier, if possible. Constructive Criticism is recommended if you have any.
DoctorGizmo (talk) 19:29, April 21, 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Added 19:29, April 21, 2016 (UTC)
|
[[Template:Review request/{{#time: ymd|19:29, April 21, 2016 (UTC)]]
Reviewed[edit]
A little bit about the reviewer
How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?
{{{Hscore}}}
How good is an idea behind the article?
{{{Cscore}}}
How good does it look and how well does it read?
{{{Pscore}}}
How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?
{{{Iscore}}}
The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.
{{{Mscore}}}
An overall summation of the article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 [The user formerly known as Makefolkslaugh] 04:22, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like this article. The idea is unique and interesting, and the presentation is on point with ample humor. Very good use of images and captions. There may be an issue with the fact that the subject of your article doesn't have a real-world equivalent, but I don't know. Check with the admins if you want. A few criticisms:
- Quite a few grammatical errors. The grammar doesn't have to be perfect but you ought to fix some of it, because it can detract from the article if there are too many.
- You should remove the link to "Rainbow knight" (unless you are planning to create that page), because there is no such page. Don't delete the text, however, because it's a funny joke.
- Just an idea: Maybe you could elaborate on the "black knights" mentioned in the caption on the first image. Maybe a paragraph about the White Knights' rivalry with them. You could use a picture of the Black Knight from Monty Python and the Holy Grail if you wanted to.
Overall, a good article, with the potential to be very good. Keep contributing, and good luck! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was a Pee Review by [The user formerly known as Makefolkslaugh] 04:22, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
{{{Yes}}}
Reviewed[edit]
A little bit about the reviewer
How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?
How good is an idea behind the article?
How good does it look and how well does it read?
How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?
The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.
An overall summation of the article.
This was a Pee Review by TheEAjawa (talk) 20:48, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
Yes
Can be expanded and color version of the picture use with Fantard.--Factfinder510 (talk) 05:01, February 6, 2019 (UTC)