Talk:An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This review. is. awesome. • <19:51, 21 Aug 2008>
I'm reviewing this one. Nobody edit conflict me. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:49, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
No, I'M reviewing this one.Nobody edit conflict me, or you'll burn in the darkest pit of hell money can buy.......Just kidding....Maybe not......--Bad Shroom 21:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- FU Edit conflict! —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
| Humour: | 10 | Not only is this review outright perfect, it succeeds in being hilarious all the way through. |
| Concept: | 10 | You have achieved what no one could have imagined |
| Prose and formatting: | 9 | I found one typo. This is why you will see a point missing in the final score. |
| Images: | 10 | While one could interpret this review as a description of an image, which becomes more and more clear in one's mind as one continues reading, I just really like that image in your sig. |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | A bit more than just averaged. |
| Final Score: | 49 | While brevity may be the soul of wit, your review far exceeds mine in every conceivable aspect. |
| Reviewer: | —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
NIGGA STOLE MY BIKE REVIEW!Socky, your review not only defines every aspect of humour (not humor), it also causes a load of irony that makes the human brain go to its limit.--Bad Shroom 22:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Which was my exact intent. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Touche.Say, what happened to User:Aethix?I have to argue with him again about how he won't let one fucking edit on his Nintendo DSi article.--Bad Shroom 22:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC)