Forum:Uncyclopedia:Facebook Page

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Uncyclopedia:Facebook Page

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6517 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Voting is now closed.
The winner is "Uncyclopedia:Sex Offender Registry".
However "Uncyclopedia:Defacebook" and "Uncyclopedia:Smugshots" will be redirects.

No, this has nothing to do with "Facebook" the webpage, or the Uncyclopedia group there. This is about Wikipedia:Facebook, and the fact that we need a page like that. I suggest that we all upload pictures not of our selves (I'm serious) as we really are, but as how we wish to be seen by other Uncyclopedians. We can build the page at User:Zombiebaron/Headshots of Folks, until we come up with a name and move it into the mainspace. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Name Vote

Assbook

Score: +0

• Really, this is the only thing what came to mind...sorry. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Nosebook

Score: +0

• Honestly, I would have voted for Assbook, but it just seemed too likely to attract more lewd humor than many people would like. --»The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 01:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Defacebook

Score: +6

• N + F. Or "D-Faceboook".---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 02:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong for! Add to the UN-theme. Mr. Briggs Inc. 02:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
• For. Now I have to airbrush clothing on my pic. Dang.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Faw. Close call between this and Uncyclopedia Sex Offender Registry, but yeah. -- 10:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Thumbs up. -- herr doktor needsAsample  [scream!] 11:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• For Short and punny - fits in well with other section titles. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• For Simple, effective. —rc (t) 21:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• For. Just don't be surprised when you wake up to see that you have no face...   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: as no one is willing to put his(er) real face, think this suits fine. Well, I confess, I thought about it, because I'm really handsome, but maybe this could put other users in a compromising situation hehehe.... -- herr doktor needsAsample  [scream!] 14:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Acctually, if you had read the pre-vote banter I wrote, you would know that I don't want to see you the pourpose it to create your "UnFace". --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Calm down, ZB. I admit, I didn't read or didn't paid enough attention to the part regarding not posting real faces. Anyway, I had the feeling that a real face would be rather uncool so I proceeded as anybody else. -- herr doktor needsAsample  [scream!] 18:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia Sex Offender Registry

Score: +9

• For - This is not a fake vote. Yes it is. —Braydie 12:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• For - Made me laugh. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• For - If this is too long we can abbreviate it USOR. --~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  22:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For - Only good one on here, other than Defacebook. But this one can be bastardized to be USOR, or however the hell you come up with VFH and KUN...still dont unerstand ANY of the abbreviatons on this website. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 23:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• For--Scott 02:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• For. But it could be called "MegUn's Law." --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• Aye. ~ 16:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• For. Funny and true! --SN W | T 07:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• For --General Insineratehymn 01:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Stalker's Handbook

Score: 0

Comment Had I not already voted for Defacebook, this is where I would go, no reason that's why... Mr. Briggs Inc. Eh?

Smugshots

Score: +5

• For - See, it's like a mugshot. Only smugger. Dutchy 15:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• For Oh, that's good!--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• For I like this, very clever. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment will it feature Tom DeLay? --~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  01:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• For. Yup, this one is better. -- herr doktor needsAsample  [scream!] 13:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• For.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 19:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

UnFacebook

Score: +2

• For - It just makes sense. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 16:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• For - It's just more Uncyclopediay. Atomik Spongeface • Ⓣ Ⓒ 18:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)