Forum:A New Forest Fire Week

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > A New Forest Fire Week
Note: This topic has been unedited for 4140 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.


Imma make this quick, because if I write/talk for a long time, I ramble. Anyhow, we need a new forest fire week. There are a lot of shit articles still on the site, and this is probably the fastest way to find a ton of them and kill them, WITH FIRE! So fuckers, lets get our flamethrowers at the ready!--The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 07:47, August 15, 2013 (UTC)

New Forest Fire Week?

Score: -2
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 07:47, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote.svg Against. VFD is working fine and dutifully deletes any article for which you can make a case. We are only slowly creating new material (I'll omit discussion of your own creative accomplishments) and destruction is not the best crusade we could invent. Spıke Ѧ 11:06 15-Aug-13
  • Symbol against vote.svg Against. What he said... Despite me being not really here, what I said on the fork applies. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 11:16, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote.svg Against. As above. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:36, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote.svg Against. Normally, I'd agree, but over the last week VFD has been running on turbo, and everything seems to be functioning just fine. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 12:05, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote.svg Against. VFD seems to be doing its job lately. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:33, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote.svg Against. Not a fan of Forest Fire Week. It is unharnessed destruction without creation, it is laziness justified as cleaning.◄► Tephra ◄► 00:24, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. Because I felt sorry for DSA. Otherwise it's a lame idea that shouldn't be allowed to go into action.                                • Puppy's talk page • 01:40 18 Aug 2013
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. Because like this a lot of people will get involved. Anton (talk) 13:54, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. Because people will be able to clean up a bunch of mainspace articles with no use anymore. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 17:43, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. There's still so much crap still lingering around that yet another purge is not only good, but almost necessary. If anything, I think that we should do Forest Fire Week every three months or so. -- HIPSTER T)alk C)untributions B)an 16:50, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote.svg Against., strong against. In the past this has been very misused. One of them, a couple of years ago, is still causing damage in red links, and many many articles had to be dug up and returned again. One user used it to try to get rid of pages he had nominated for VFD which were saved (should have been banned for a few weeks imnho). Please keep your forest fire to yourself, no burn baby, no burn. Aleister 17:29 20-8-'13

Nooo... my pretty ide... OOH, VOCALOID!

I'm not mad at you for downvoting my plan into oblivion... just getting that out there. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 04:48, August 21, 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://uncyclopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Forum:A_New_Forest_Fire_Week&oldid=5725040"