From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. I cleaned out the listcruft and external links and what is left exists only to glorify a website meme, advertise for more readers, and tell castration jokes. Spıke Ѧ 11:26 9-Feb-15
- Delete. Anton (talk) 16:36, February 19, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:25, February 19, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. --EStop (talk) 20:53, February 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Go kitty. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:43, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Yeah, we get it. Tittie. Ca-ca. The article has nothing else. Spıke Ѧ 02:55 1-Mar-15
- Delete. Didn't even pond-er. EStop (talk) 14:08, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Little or no humor. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 14:20, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:32, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes. I mean, no. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:46, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. Nothing but rambling lists. Spıke Ѧ 15:27 6-Mar-15
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Perhaps cut out the long crap list in the middle. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:47, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
- I cut out all the long crap lists, and it no longer seems huffworthy. Spıke Ѧ 12:46 13-Mar-15
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Suggest a re-direct or a rename of the existing Astronaut article. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:35, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
- In fact, we usually don't use redirects just to jump from the plural to the singular. If deleted,
[[astronauts]] in the code of an article would go to Astronaut. Spıke Ѧ 14:54 11-Mar-15
- I hadn't noticed that. Where do you add that in the article?--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:05, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Well, anywhere; for now, coding
[[astronaut]]s will send the reader to Astronaut whether or not the VFD'd article exists. Spıke Ѧ 16:31 11-Mar-15
- Delete. Unfocused ramble. The follow-on paragraphs of Care and feeding, including the runs of capital letters, were added by Anon in July 2009. Spıke Ѧ 14:54 11-Mar-15
- Delete. If we didn't already have Astronaut as an article I would think it could be rewritten, but since we don't need two of the same thing, and this article is rather stupid, kill it with fire.--Uncycloperson (talk) 00:56, March 14, 2015 (UTC)-
- Delete. What everyone else said. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:32, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Abort. --EStop (talk) 14:37, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. We already have Uncyclopedia:Best of for featured content, and this page is just a bunch of broken links, and the person who created it admitted it was a fork and is no longer active. I tried redirecting it, but that's apparently against some kind of rule. ~jcm 17:09, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
- The kind of rule is that you don't summarily delete another Uncyclopedian's work (by making it a redirect) but you bring it here, as you now have. Spıke Ѧ 23:38 13-Mar-15
- Delete. In bad disrepair and long forgotten; a collection of deleted templates. Spıke Ѧ 23:38 13-Mar-15
- Delete. We should just be able to huff stuff like this without a vote. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:36, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. --EStop (talk) 14:55, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundo. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:44, March 15, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Upon further review, the history reveals that this 2006 page is a project of charter Uncyclopedian Todd Lyons, which his Change Summary says he is too lazy to finish. It is not a collection of deleted templates but a collection of templates he never finished creating. Spıke Ѧ 23:38 13-Mar-15
|
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. This was blanked by a new user, who found no humor in it. I find next to no humor in it other than to overadvertise the old/expired Mudkips meme & expand upon it. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 05:54, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Essentially vanity! 071058s (talk) 05:58, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- "Essentially vanity" is cropped from my Delete vote above. The current article is awful but it is not vanity. Spıke Ѧ 09:09 14-Mar-15
- Delete. "To have sex with Pikachu may result in sexy AIDS Pikachu." That is the high point of this Sandbox-quality article. Spıke Ѧ 08:58 14-Mar-15
- Delete. Not very much going on there.--EStop (talk) 14:30, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. How was this not deleted earlier? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:10, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Eh?--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:46, March 15, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Write humor, not riddles. Spıke Ѧ 02:20 14-Mar-15
- Delete. What is this even supposed to be? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:40, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Tried using a mirror. Could only make out George Bush (seems a theme) and Micheal Pfieffer is the title. The rest is, in scientific terms, gobbly-gook.--Uncycloperson (talk) 02:51, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Easier ways to work hard for a laugh.--EStop (talk) 15:01, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. There's no way I'm going to spend the time to try and read this whole thing backwards, which seems to be the main (only?) real gag here. Chunkles (talk) 17:31, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A really poor article that turns out to mostly be a list and then another list. Nothing redeemable.--Uncycloperson (talk) 01:16, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The hook "You didn't hear this from me" was endearing (almost counteracting the first-person style) until I read it the third time and saw that the article has nothing else except to be "in the style of the thing it's about." Then a list with Oscar Wilde, Mr. T, Your mom, and Chuck Norris, surely the Top Four of having no fresh new concept and clutching to permanence through our website memes. Spıke Ѧ 01:21 14-Mar-15
- Delete. "You didn't hear this from me" was the only entertaining part of this article. Everything else was cliche and unfunny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:40, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. --EStop (talk) 14:58, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Listicles. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:42, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Perhaps a future article could have "You didn't hear from me..." as a quote. Nothing more to say.--Uncycloperson (talk) 02:55, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Charter Uncyclopedian Rei wrote this for the 2006 PLS, naming herself, calling on readers to add their name to it, and having no comedy theme except ridiculing those crazed by money. It is collective vanity. Spıke Ѧ 15:44 13-Mar-15
- Delete. I really liked the first paragraph with the Game Show host diction. Wish that was the theme. The rest? Look what you could have won! --EStop (talk) 15:08, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. The ending list of names is visually unappealing, but the article does have a few good jokes. It needs some clean-up, not deletion, although SPIKE's substitute is good too. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:36, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- I deleted that list and made other clean-up after going11:55 15-Mar-15 back in to see what I could filch for the proposed replacement, but there really is nothing but a non-encyclopedic, first-person, chatty sales pitch. Except Pink Floyd lyrics, and Uncyclopedians didn't write them. Please reconsider — or spice it up yourself. Spıke Ѧ 09:08 14-Mar-15
- Keep. The edited version looks fine to me. Don't see a need to delete this one. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:09, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Written by AmericanBastard in 2007. Any cleverness is limited by the fact that it is about an Amendment that doesn't exist, it doesn't relate to the way Amendments are ratified, or anything else but the fact that Bush is a dope. Intro mentions June 42nd and Darkies. Article has no point. Spıke Ѧ 23:32 13-Mar-15
- Delete. Interesting article, but it is a parody of nothing, just a George Bush bash, and I had trouble following it.--Uncycloperson (talk) 01:07, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
- Keep. I liked this - Los Angeles Police Department of Alcohol, Narcotics, Citations, and Enforcement (LAPDANCE) so despite other weaknesses, I prefer to let it stay. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:38, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
- A contrived, off-color acronym saves an article? Say it isn't so! Spıke Ѧ 11:53 24-Mar-15
|
Comments |
- Abstain. Certainly not the worst thing I've read but it is pretty weak at points. Kind of on the fence about this one. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:39, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Abstain. It really grinds not to be able to make a decision. It's one of those that is barely okay-ish, but if it has potential.... Undecided. --EStop (talk) 09:39, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This article is very random and incoherent, with no real comedic strategy followed. Also, the original author is long gone. Chunkles (talk) 17:23, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Newbie CommieBoy89 (with Drtran adding three Wildeisms in a row and illustrations) has had a seven-year run, which should now end. An article no one will look up, about nothing and with no theme. The Trivia section, consisting of side notes on a fictional person we have never been gotten to care about, is more fluff. (But many good authors are also "long gone" and I don't hold that against their articles.) Spıke Ѧ 17:32 17-Mar-15
- Delete. One for Illogicopedia but I haven't a clue if that site is still with the living. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:46, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
- It appears it still is. Chunkles (talk) 04:41, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't fly. --EStop (talk) 09:27, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A mediocre article about nothing significant that loses interest quickly. ConCass2 (talk) 20:24, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Unless there is some kind of legacy with the piece I'm unaware of, this is about as funny as someone hitting a saucepan with a wooden spoon.--EStop (talk) 06:12, March 16, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. ...about 232 times. Spıke Ѧ 20:34 16-Mar-15
- Delete. I got bored after the first repetition. Entry for the 2016 Turner Prize perhaps. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:44, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It is just about 500 instances of the word "contents". There. I saved you from clicking the article. ConCass2 (talk) 20:27, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Given how flaky nominator's Internet is, I formally relieve him of the task of prepending {{VFD}} to this ponderous article. Spıke Ѧ 20:34 16-Mar-15
- Given how flaky the nominator is, he formally thanks the Administrator for the Top Cover and will endeavor to compete the cycle fully! --EStop (talk) 08:04, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
|