| Vote
|
Score: -3
|
| Nominated by:
|
 Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 01:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 2
|
- Self Nom and For - because this is so damn funny, even if I wrote it. I can just see it on the main page! --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 01:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- For Le Cejak • <1:51, 01 Jul 2008>
|
Against: 5
|
- Nope. I didn't find it funny. If you are going to criticize my articles on humo(u)r, you should check yours first. ----Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 01:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Against --THINKER 02:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Against. --
 Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 06:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Against. Sorry man, but I didn't find it funny, pure and simple. --UU - natter
 08:56, Jul 1
- Meh -RAHB 10:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
- Oh guys, don't vote against on a guy's article because they voted against yours. In fact... don't ever vote against is really solid advice. Le Cejak • <1:47, 01 Jul 2008>
- I am not voting against for that sole reason, I just wanted to point out the hypocrisy. ----Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 01:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeesh... Le Cejak • <1:51, 01 Jul 2008>
- An even more solid advice would be to vote according to the article's quality. Nothing wrong with voting against, as long as it relates only to the article and nothing more. ~
 08:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 Abstain. - I like the idea, I just don't think this works too well, mabye liek a letter from News Corp or something--Sycamore (Talk) 09:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
