From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 1 people advocate the loving and careful treatment of disabled singers
|
| Nominated by:
|
~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)  23:00, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
For: 3
|
- Nom + For I lol'd ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:00, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
- For-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 00:27, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:41, 11 December 2011
|
Against: 2
|
- Against A bunch of decent jokes in there, but I feel the only very funny joke is the title. It's just my opinion.
 Mattsnow 06:14, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Against. Along the lines of what Mattsnow and Shabidoo said. --
 Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:32, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
Sorry. This might be a good idea ... but it is not executed that well. The idea of killing three retards and leaving them to bleed is shocking...but less funny and more kind of just sad. If the article was about three retards plotting to kill one of the kareoke singers for winning the competition...or the three retards acidentatly killing themselves or even if they just dissapeard and every one acted like it didn't happen it could work (with little change). I'd happily vote for this if the article was less sad and more helarious. --ShabiDOO 17:07, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Are you implying that if a "normal" person had their vocal chords removed it would less shocking than if it happened to a disabled person? Or are you saying that if the 3 disabled people accidentally killed themselves rather than have their vocal chords removed it would have been funnier? Either way, them being disabled has no bearing on the course of the article and is just one of the facts of the story. They aren't bad singers because they are disabled, they are bad singers because they can't sing. If anything, the endings is happy, the 3 boys have their vocal chords reconstructed and the "bad guy" loses out. I think you're reading the article a little bit too literally, something being sad is surely a by-product of something having a slither of truth to it, and I can tell you, this article aint got much of that namby pamby truth rubbish in it. --Writey 21:23, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Whoah, who is this new guy telling me how I should interpret articles ? Better we get together and play a game of Mario Kart then you telling me how my point of view is wrong. --ShabiDOO 00:03, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
- He's the author of the UnNews in question. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:11, 12 December 2011
- Wanna join us in our game of MarioKart socky? --ShabiDOO 01:30, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm up for some 3 way Mario Kart. Dibs Bowser. --Writey 20:39, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Yoshi. --ShabiDOO 23:53, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
