Uncyclopedia:VFH/Marijuana (another nom)

Vote	Score: 2 gateway drugs
Nominated by:	RA HB 22:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
For: 11	For I think this article is absolutely satirically on point. Until I checked it today, I thought it had been featured last time. One of my favorites I think. -RA HB 22:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC) "Hard Street Drug". I'm sold. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:33, 29 September 2008 (UTC) For. 84.194.239.240 22:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC) For. ShuaDaddy weak for — Sir Sycamore (talk) 11:43, 30 September 2008 (UTC) For. Best article I've seen on VFH in a long time.--Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 14:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC) For. Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Talk! 14:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC) For. 60.48.33.23 16:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC) Completely caught me by surprise that it had been nominated. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 06:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Weakish For, But Still Very Much A For - Love the satire, but I'm not sure how accessible it would be on the main page. It's quality though, so it gets the nod. - UnIdiot \| \| Talk \| Contribs - 20:07, Oct 1 weak for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Strong For. This brought me out of my self-imposed VFH-exile. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 17:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Against: 9	Sure it may have been satirical But it never came across as funny to me just... bland. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 04:21, 30 September 2008 (UTC) Against. 77.223.207.205 Against. I didn't see the funny. Sorry. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 13:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Against. I like the idea, but no giggles from me... Maybe it just needs to be more ranty... Mr N Fork you! 18:26, Oct 1 Against. Scathingly satirical, but a bit bland, and just not that funny to me. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:32, Oct 1 Against. I could only assume that whoever wrote this did so with the assumption that everyone here loved getting hammered and lived in the US of A. But, heck, what are the odds for both being true? -- JoeMonco 15:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Against. Amy Rose 22:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Against I'm not feeling it. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Against. Not as funny as Reefer Madness. 72.1.195.8 23:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Against. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 14:58, Oct 8
Comments:	Though, it's a good article, I don't like this image. It may be intentionally bad, but does it have to be this HIDEOUS?! 84.194.239.240 22:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Yes it does have to be this HIDEOUS! It fits the article perfectly.--Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 14:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC) I guess you have to take marijuana to like the image. 84.194.239.240 15:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC) To be honest, that might make it considerably worse... -RA HB 20:21, 30 September 2008 (UTC) Yes, I see it now. With marijuana, it looks like some absurdly disgusting monster, spreading ultimate ugliness. 84.194.239.240 22:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC) I am always wary of people writing articles while stoned, and this piece simply fulfilled my nightmare in a million different ways. Also, poor execution, ugly/unremarkable pictures and FDA. --JoeMonco 15:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC) I love you too. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 04:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC) I've looked at this a couple of times without being able to make my mind up. Guess that makes this an abstain then. --UU - natter 08:46, Oct 9