From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 2 ant sexologists approved this article
|
| Nominated by:
|
L 09:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 5
|
- --User:Zork Implementor L/Sig 09:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Selfor because I had fun writing this horrible, horrible thing Le Cejak • <13:05, 29 May 2008>
 For.-Just to be an asshole--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)- For what can I say? It'd be friggin' sweet to see an article from one of our Cajek vs. THE writing contests featured. --THE 21:44, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Qhat? I liked it anyways. U gize r cr8zy. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:53 May 29
|
Against: 3
|
- Against eyeroller, and the censored shit doesn't help much either. --THINKER 14:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Against A VERY rare against vote against something Cajek has done. I think we both know that this is not his best work. It's a good article (obviously) but on this rare occasion it's just not up to scratch enough to feature. Actually I think it's awesome, I'm just jealous of all his features. No seriously, not this time... Sorry dude. MrN
   Fork you! 17:53, May 29
- Against censored stuff is retarded and its another stupid how to. just not vfh material--Moonzeppelin MUN 04:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
 Comment. I'm not sure its featurable either. The history is that this was originally written in an hour during a contest with THE. Le Cejak • <14:36, 29 May 2008>
- While I don't think that speedy creation bars a nom from FA, it may play a part here. --THINKER 16:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Abstain I can't say I didn't laugh at this, but I can't say that I wasn't rolling my eyes through a lot of it. Therefor, I can say that I can't say which say I say. -RAHB 05:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
