From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 11.5 stoned hippies
|
| Nominated by:
|
Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀12:22 June 12 2008
|
For: 12.5
|
- Nom and Five. Having reviewed this article by Necropaxx, I will admit that I was impressed with how it has turned out. It looks like a supreme article from my POV, and I believe it ready to be featured. Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀12:22 June 12 2008
- For. --Sir Starnestommy
 (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 22:24, Jun. 12, 2008
- for. i fully expected to vote against before even opening this article, as it seems like it would be one of those articles that get mercilessly edited by IP hacks one line at a time. however...it's not that thing i just said! --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 02:15, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Go Hippies! Due to the smell, I shall never approach this totally factual article again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vampiregirl (talk • contribs)
- Self-4. For those of you who are going to actually try to get a high off ground Sahara banana peels after reading this, don't do it. It doesn't work. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:43, Jun 13
- Dude, I'm so high! Goddamn hippies. GET OFF MY LAND! -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:06, 14 Jun
- Very Funny!. That article's pretty funny. One thumb up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skyler (talk • contribs)
- for this was one of the first uncyc articles ive read and it made me want to read more so ya....--Moonzeppelin MUN 15:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Diiiig maaaan. Mind if I do a J? -RAHB 08:27, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 For. - It has had some top notch work done since I voted--Sycamore (Talk) 13:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)- lol 71.94.132.17 00:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- Weak for. Significant improvement since my previous vote + some good lines = change of vote. --UU - natter
 10:14, Jun 29
- For It's all good man. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
Against. It seems to waver between writing in character as a hippie and more detached criticism of the hippie movement. It could also be more visually impressive. Try adding a few more pictures, playing with the font colours, etc. The most important thing, though, is to pick a style and stick to it. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 13:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)- Needs more work Seems like it deals in cliche, the prose is alright but lacks flow/consistency and it is rather boring visually, sorry... just read Mickey's comment :P --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     13:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 Against.-as per my former abstain and DJ--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Against. Per Mickey. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:39, Jun 16
|
| Comments:
|
* Abstain.-I jsut don't think it works all that well--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Abs. I like a lot of it, but the prose flows in a way that doesn't appeal to me. --THINKER 05:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yikes! I just saw how many against votes were already on my article and I am working on it to make it better. Better prose, better flow, better style, coming up! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:44, Jun 17
- I've tuned it up a bit. Feel free to recheck it out! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:56, Jun 18
- Abstain. The parts that made it against-worthy have been cleaned up, but it still doesn't quite reach my high for standards. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 11:44, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, you just referred to "my high" in a page about an article about hippies! You're winner. --Hyperbole 15:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
20:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)