From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 15.5 piles of stunned ninjas
|
| Nominated by:
|
IronLung 20:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 15.5
|
 For.. IronLung 20:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)- For. Hot stuff. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. –72.193.236.89 22:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'm a whore. --
 -kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- For Classic ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 00:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4 - T.L.B.
 WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:13, Feb 25
- For. Rabbi Techno
 kvetch  Contribs  FOXES 14:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. Although it could use a link to UnScripts:Average Cop in there. C'mon, it's crying out for one... --UU - natter
 15:24, Feb 25
- Weak For. I would like to see some more
leg length, but it's good enough as it is. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:11, Feb 25
- Fwhore. I guess it could have stood to be a little longer, but I do kind of like it at the length it is now, too.
 pillow talk 17:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sure the text is fine but the pictures! Oh my god the pictures!! That woman is hooot! --Kit talk 09:37 26 February
- omg she is so hawt ahd taht one time she fought those ninjas and was like WHAP WHACK Hee-YAH!. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 15:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. per aboive Mnb'z 06:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. Heheh. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:37, 27 Feb 2009
- The link to Prettiestpretty's userpage did it. Oh wait, the rest of the article was hilarious too. It's short, sweet, and yet I want to fight it in a very formulaic and cliched manner with outstanding camera angles and terrible dialogue. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. I normally abstain from articles I consider length challenged but the writing has won me over on this one.--
   20:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
|
| Comments:
|
Abstain. I really like it, it follows good veins. But I thought it was a tad short and could even explore the joke a bit further. However, I wouldn't dare vote against it. Consider this a conditional for then. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Some of our featured articles tend to be rather short. This is certainly not too short to be featured. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Screw it, you're right. I'm being picky. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- In my Pee Review I recommended making it longer, but only if the standard of humour could be maintained. I also said I would beat against voters with the wooden leg I got in Nam if their vote was based on length alone. You've been warned. IronLung 00:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I love the link to Prettiestpretty's userpage, by the way. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:12, Feb 25
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
