| Vote
|
Score: 0.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
RAHB 03:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 4
|
- Yes -RAHB 03:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Self-W♥v. Thanks RAHB. This was a TDB entry that apparently was thought to be of some value. I enjoyed writing it, anyways. Who knows, I may be getting my groove back after all. sir
 sysrq @ 03:19 Dec 22
- Yes: It must be a lack-of-sanity thing. My deep mental scars not only allow me to like this article, it also gets my "yes" vote to put it on the front page. Maybe on April 1st, we can highlight the article and use the bucket picture as the UncyclopediA logo for the day, making the image inescapable.--
   13:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- For Tasty. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 3.5
|
- Tasteless, yes. Funny, no. There's a good opportunity for satire here except it just wasn't all... together. Particularly the last sentence. The funny (which there is) is overwhelmed by the tasteless parts. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     14:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Against per above. Its tasteless but not funny, it should be tasteless and funny.--Mnbvcxz 17:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Against. More disgusting than hilarious, IMO. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:27, Dec 23
- Against. completely tasteless 173.102.100.102 03:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
- Abs I like the article. It's quality stuff and probably fits the subject matter perfectly. Just did not laugh. Sorry man. I'm looking forward to your next ;) MrN
   Fork you! 19:11, Dec 26
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
