Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:OMGwhatHaveIdone/Broom Hulda Clark

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archived

Guidelines

FAQ

Pee Week

Committee

RotM

Broom Hulda Clark

Filed on behalf of author OMGwhatHaveIdone. Spıke Ѧ 14:32 7-Feb-14

Author's explanation

OK so if you wanna know what the heck I am parodying this person I am loosily basing this off of is of a very simaler name... IS it cool to mention that..That I am insipred by real life things? Anyways. Ms Clarck had a bussiness in zappers and health... Shes dead now.. Her son carries on the bussiness. SOme are helped some aint.. I dont know about all that. I just know I enjoy ripping into it and that we all should because it is good to be able to take a joke.

Her claim to fame was using frequewncy therapy and propery diet to help people. The Cops said she was full of it and their were legal troubles.. In the end she fled to mexico... so yeah whats that say about all that. I dont know. BUt maybe it should be made fun of?

I'd kinda like to keep this clark centric but if anyone wants to expand it to everything else thats fine.. Anyone can contribute anything to this... I just want see it made better. Feel free to throw your two cents at it. OMGwhatHaveIdone (talk) 06:38, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

{{Review_request|14:32, February 7, 2014 (UTC)}}

Reviewed

​Reviewer details

A little bit about the reviewer

{{{Reviewer}}}

​Humour

How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?

{{{Hscore}}}

{{{Hcomment}}}

​Concept

How good is an idea behind the article?

{{{Cscore}}}

{{{Ccomment}}}

​Prose and Formatting

How good does it look and how well does it read?

{{{Pscore}}}

{{{Pcomment}}}

​Images

How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?

{{{Iscore}}}

{{{Icomment}}}

​Miscellaneous

The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.

{{{Mscore}}}

{{{Mcomment}}}

​Summary

An overall summation of the article.

{{{Fcomment}}}

--Everyotherusernamewastaken (talk) 18:35, May 28, 2014 (UTC) Humour: I don't understand what the article is 'parodying'--maybe I'm just dumb and don't understand it. Lingo & Grammar: I would generally take this opportunity to correct grammar, but I'm not sure if that's what you're making fun of. You've certainly made the article completely inaccessible to the average reader. I'm not sure whether these are inside jokes or not. If they are then this shouldn't be here. 'Images: They say that whoever manages to photoshop a lightning bolt and evil eyes onto a picture of the retired pope will be crowned King Arthur. For that I commend you. Concept: I've no idea what Broom Hulda Clark is, but if you rename the article 'Drivel' or 'Textspeak' or something then it might just work.

This was a Pee Review by --Everyotherusernamewastaken (talk) 18:35, May 28, 2014 (UTC)

Yes