01:33, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Added 01:33, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
|
[[Template:Review request/{{#time: ymd|01:33, May 27, 2014 (UTC)]]
Reviewed[edit]
A little bit about the reviewer
How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?
{{{Hscore}}}
How good is an idea behind the article?
{{{Cscore}}}
How good does it look and how well does it read?
{{{Pscore}}}
How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?
{{{Iscore}}}
The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.
{{{Mscore}}}
An overall summation of the article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vavaunni--Vavaunni (talk) 06:26, December 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The humor, sadly, is not that great. Reading it is akin to reading the wikipedia article..... No, not the facts, but
It just seems to drone on and on for ever. The humor is everywhere, but I didnt laugh.
The humor needs a LOT of improvement. Namely, it needs to make people laugh. Humor is subjective, but repeated
comments about drugs and sex loses its charm after some time.
The article is formatted in top notch manner. The grammar is mostly correct and the words used apt.
The utilisation of images has been done well.
Im not saying that this article is no laughs. The first part especially is rib-tickling. However, the humor seriously needs to be improved upon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was a Pee Review by Vavaunni--Vavaunni (talk) 06:26, December 26, 2014 (UTC)
{{{Yes}}}