Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Meaning
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Meaning[edit]
Up for a fourth review. Fourth reviews have to be done with care, because I've basically heard everything about this. In other words, I, and everybody else who puts an article up on Pee Review, want an in-depth review from you fuckers! I'm a REVIEW NAZI! • <-> (Dec 18 / 14:51)
Revue de Pierre - we take the pee out of pee review and replace it with Pierre
This article is being reviewed by Le Marquis de Nofu. It is amazing that the aristocracy has time for this piss Pierre!
--Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 17:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Humour: | 8.5 | The breakdown!
|
Concept: | 10 | I am not one to complain about concepts like this. This is good. |
Prose and formatting: | 10 | Well, randomness cat was amused by this article until he realized the author knows wtf he's doing. When randomness cat realized the pointlessness had a point, he promptly went into a coma. You will be sent the bill. |
Images: | 5.2 | NO! If you are going to use the same picture again and again, I want stuff to be going on in the picture. E.g.: there is a hat on this dude that changes every time, or people have sex in the background, or a bear sneaking up behind him, or a knife fight, or a parked car. You get the picture. It is a must that something funny is going on b/c that picture gets predictable, which is only funny until the third time you see it. BTW, is that Teddy Roosevelt's fuckin' face? Is it? Really? Could it be!?!?!111!!11!!!! |
Miscellaneous: | 9.1 | You earn this for making scrabble so huffing funny. |
Final Score: | 42.8 | Emily browning rocks. Fix the image. Your article is very good, but that first section could do with a tweaking. I love the scrabble jokes. You might want to consider changing some of that odd banter about scrabble into back-and-forth user and wise dude nonsense. Just a thought. I imagine we'll be seeing this on VFH soon? |
Reviewer: | --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 17:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC) |
Ahh, balls. Stick with the Indian cajek, maybe tweak the text a bit. ;) :P
Nice review Ggarfield, good to see your putting lots of effort into the process. MrN Fork you! 20:10, Dec 19