Welcome to the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing! (Amateur means we don't pay you to do it.)
This is where the original Uncyclopedia wound up. You might as well pick a user name. We have no "partners" that want to sell you stuff. Giving your email simply lets you recover your password; we don't send spam. Uncyclopedians get a talk page, private edit area, and a welcome, maybe, if you actually edit; and we won't de-platform you for your views, if they're funny.
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Mad TV
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mad TV[edit]
Second opinion?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 9 | Very funny. One of those first-person narratives that I like. Speaking directly to the reader and insulting them is a great way to get laughs. |
| Concept: | 9 | As per above. The contrast between SNL and Mad TV is brilliant. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | Seemed flawless. Nice, sexy blue links, good headers, categorized, etc. |
| Images: | 8 | Your text to picture ratio is about right, given the sizes of the images. Any bigger and the text would get claustrophobic. The images serve their purpose(s) and have funny captions. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9.1821 | I never know what miscellaneous is supposed to cover. But good job on it. |
| Final Score: | 45.1821 | Very good article. My only question though is: why'd you take out the table of contents? |
| Reviewer: | --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC) | |