Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Mad TV

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archived

Guidelines

FAQ

Pee Week

Committee

RotM

Mad TV

Second opinion?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	9	Very funny. One of those first-person narratives that I like. Speaking directly to the reader and insulting them is a great way to get laughs.
Concept:	9	As per above. The contrast between SNL and Mad TV is brilliant.
Prose and formatting:	10	Seemed flawless. Nice, sexy blue links, good headers, categorized, etc.
Images:	8	Your text to picture ratio is about right, given the sizes of the images. Any bigger and the text would get claustrophobic. The images serve their purpose(s) and have funny captions.
Miscellaneous:	9.1821	I never know what miscellaneous is supposed to cover. But good job on it.
Final Score:	45.1821	Very good article. My only question though is: why'd you take out the table of contents?
Reviewer:	--Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)