Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Boris Yeltsin (2nd)

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archived

Guidelines

FAQ

Pee Week

Committee

RotM

Boris Yeltsin

Taken a second look, does anyone want to add to these two reviews? I'm a newer user, so my scores may not match the views of this site... Le Man de Jump OhOne 19:03, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

• Submitted on behalf of InMooseWeTrust who would like someone to take a second look. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:59, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Come on, no one wants to pee review this? InMooseWeTrust 20:15, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • I'll try this. ~ 08:20, Apr 25, 2010

Sorry, lost my reviewing muse. Somebody else please take this. ~ 13:02, Apr 25, 2010

Humour:	9	The article was very witty and clever, especially within the presidency part. However, you did repeat on the alcohol joke a bit much. It worked out okay in this smaller article - and I understand Yeltsin was a heavy drinker - but if the article was any longer I might have lost my patience with it. Make your jokes a tad bit more varied next time, and I will give it a ten.
Concept:	8	Again, this relates to the redundancy of the alcohol joke. It was funny portraying Yeltsin as "the only president with a lower approval rating than alcohol level", but again, make sure your jokes are slightly more varied.
Prose and formatting:	10	You had this weird issue with the formatting on the Presidency section, where the words nearly overlapped with the pictures, but this might be a flaw with the Wikipedia formatting in general, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Other than that, the article was very well done grammar-wise, and it even appeared you gave it a nice spellcheck before you finished. This part was very good.
Images:	9	It appeared that you got most of your images off the web and added captions to them. While most people (including me) do this, edit a few more images. The captions were still very good, though.
Miscellaneous:	9	Your average score, it appears that it is right where it should be. Very good.
Final Score:	45	This article was very good, just remember in the future that you should vary your jokes a little.
Reviewer:	Le Man de Jump OhOne 19:03, April 25, 2010 (UTC)