Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/A pizza a day keeps the doctor away
A pizza a day keeps the doctor away[edit]
The chief justice told me that this is the place to get some good advice. Please take a look at my article and tell me what to do. Thank you. President Barack Obama 12:04, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
Humour: | 8 | Hello mysterious young noob (or sockpuppet of an anonymous older user... we'll see, if not I suppose that's a compliment). This is a pretty good article you have here. Let me take you through it section by section.
Intro From what the doctor thinks All the other sections onwards |
Concept: | 7 | From the title onwards, the article is a truly unique one. That's probably one of the best compliments an article can get, in my opinion. A lot of users here will shoot this down because it's a bit random, and untraditional, but ultimately the key to humour is surprise - and your article has that in spades. My only issue with the overall concept is that the article kind of feels like it's in two halves. The first two sections don't really link up with each other, or the rest of the article, while everything from the pizza POV onwards is fairly consistent. So in other words, the first half is total madness, while the second half is essentially a series of different opinions from inanimate objects. The problem is that these two halves don't really gel, and you may have to choose between the two styles. This could probably be fixed quite easily by strengthening the poem section, which really stands out right now. In my opinion, there's no problem with being inconsistent, you just have to be consistent about it (if that makes sense?). To me, the article looks messy at first, and then finds it's groove about half way through. You seem to have a good grasp of how this site works already, so I will leave that for you to mull over. I can't think of any more suggestions anyway. |
Prose and formatting: | 7 | I found a couple of spelling/grammar errors but nothing major, and nothing I couldn't fix myself. There are probably more in there, I wouldn't rely on my proofreading skills, so give it another once-over yourself, maybe even use a spellchecker if you're lazy. The formatting bugs me a little, mainly because of all the white space you've got here, caused by all the {{-}} you use. Now I realise that this is a measure to reduce image crowding (you have a lot of images for what is a relatively short piece word-wise). It doesn't ruin the article or anything, but it probably won't prove popular with the other users either. If there's a way you can alternate the images from left to right that might help, so maybe try that. It's up to you ultimately of course. The only other thing is that there are no links. Again, I know this is a non-traditional article, but it's something to think about. They certainly help everything look a bit more encyclopaedic, if nothing else. |
Images: | 6.5 | The images are all fine, but let's go through them one at a time. The first is ok, but I would rather see an image of a real pizza than a cartoon one. Not sure why exactly, so feel free to disregard that. The one with the kid wearing the gas mask is ok, but as I said above a picture of the doctor might be beneficial, if only to make the poem fit in here better. Like the prose, the images get a lot stronger from here on. |
Miscellaneous: | 7.5 | Overall score. |
Final Score: | 36 | So overall one of the most bizarre pieces I've read for a while, but that is definitely its biggest strength. Generally speaking I found it really funny, and there were only a few problems that I noticed. All of this is what leads me to think you might be more experienced than you're letting on. Could it be you, Horace Donald Westenchester? Anyway, the main thing I would suggest you do here is try to tie together the two halves of the article that you have here. I can definitely see this being a VFH contender in the future. If there's anything I've said here that you want me to explain better, or if you want my opinion on anything I might have missed, please let me know and I'll try to help. I hope the review is ok |
Reviewer: | --Black Flamingo 21:39, March 10, 2011 (UTC) |