Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/21st Century Nazis/2nd review
21st Century Nazis[edit]
Alright, I think this one's about ready for mainspace. I've got an alternate ending here. Which one is better, or do you have an even better suggestion for the ending? I can't wait to find out! -OptyC Sucks! CUN13:27, 28 Apr
OptyC Sucks! CUN13:27, 28 Apr 13:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Woah, back off there, 'cause it's YesTimeToPee...for YTTE, not you. Sorry, you'll just have to go find somewhere else to empty your bladder, or you can choose to wet yourself. I got this spot, biatch.
Humour: | 9 | I've read both versions of the article and I've decided the first one is definitely better (that is the one at User:Optimuschris/Work_in_Progress ). I'm therefore not going to review the alternative ending, however if you really do want the second ending reviewed, drop by my talkpage and I'll give you a brief paragraph or two of my thoguhts on it. Anyway, commence reviewing...
21st Century Nazis: Nice use of the image, it needs nothing more. Makes you smirk the first time you read it. Good. |
Concept: | 9 | The concept is ingenious! Nazis getting a PR make over? Nazis in the 21st century? Funny. Also the idea that this article isn't told just like a straight-forward article but by a Nazi going around door to door letting people know about this revival makes it even better. I don't think there's much you can do to make it any better, it's already good. I think the best thing you can do with the concept is sit back smugly and admire what a good idea you came up with. No, I really mean that. It was also "chit-chatty" and funny. Extremely good work. |
Prose and formatting: | 8 | Overall it's good. Be careful about the text getting into blocks, though. Also, why do you use level one headings all the time? It's a little unconventional, that's all... I reckon I would also centre the *knock knock knock* and {{big}} tag it. Also for this style of friendly door-to-door writing maybe you should remove the contents with the __NOTOC__ tag... Just a thought. Otherwise, as I said, it's good formatting and prose you've got here. There's a nice spattering of good, healthy blue links and it's not an ugly article...infact it's beautiful in it's own wiki-style way! Nicely done.
|
Images: | 8 | You've got three very good pictures there, all of them photochopped, I believe? Whether or not they were done specifically for this article doesn't matter, they're very nice, and very relevant. "These days we're putting our ovens to use making cookies. " - That made a funny picture very funny, well done there! The first picture of the nazi guy, is very good, fits in well and helps tell the story. The third nazi windmill picture is also very good, but possibly the weakest picture - even still it's not bad. A slightly funnier caption on this one could do some good, though. Ultimately all the pictures you've got are good and don't need and changing. One or two more pictures of this calibre and you could be looking at a 9, or even a 10! Good work. |
Miscellaneous: | 8.5 | Av-er-rage-duh! |
Final Score: | 42.5 | Well, well, well! A brilliant article you've got here that only needs the very slightest of changes and fine re-adjustments! Clearly VFH material in the future. Your article is full of irony and understatement and is very well written and intelligent. If it's nommed for VFH I'm certain it'll get through very easily. This is a very nice article you've written and I'm jealous you came up with the idea! You're a good writer and I hope you keep these VFH-standard articles up! You're an asset to Uncyclopedia! There really isn't anything more to say, but I wish you good luck with this article. |
Reviewer: | - 18:26 28 April Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE |